Re: Full life cycle development
- From: "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 06:16:33 GMT
James D Carroll wrote:
>
> Phlip .
> >
> > However, in real life, developers who are not as smart as you or I tend
> > to re-invent Waterfall naturally. They code-and-fix, discover new
> > requirements, and discover their code is now brittle. So they say, "The
> > next time, we will gather all the requirements first, before we start."
> >
> > I have heard them say exactly that, with my own ears.
>
> Sure you have. Its called "Extreme Programming".
Read the other posts here very carefully. Nobody, not even the anti-XP
zealots, advocates collecting all requirements up front. Some of the
earliest big software projects, such as aerospace projects, used strict
iterations. They collected requirements in real-time.
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: corba.object
- Re: Full life cycle development
- References:
- Full life cycle development
- From: Rof
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: Phlip
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: James D Carroll
- Full life cycle development
- Prev by Date: Re: Full life cycle development
- Next by Date: Re: UML: Is it allowed to introduce custom stereotypes on classes? What about methods?
- Previous by thread: Re: Full life cycle development
- Next by thread: Re: Full life cycle development
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|