Re: Full life cycle development
- From: "Nick Malik [Microsoft]" <nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 06:40:18 -0700
one typo I noticed after hitting "send":
> Far worse: the depreciation cost skyrockets. The time needed to recoup
> the cost of the new development is too reap benefits. ROI is completely
> upside down.
should read:
> Far worse: the depreciation cost skyrockets. The time needed to recoup
> the cost of the new development is too small to reap benefits. ROI is
> completely upside down.
--
--- Nick Malik [Microsoft]
MCSD, CFPS, Certified Scrummaster
http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this forum are my own, and not
representative of my employer.
I do not answer questions on behalf of my employer. I'm just a
programmer helping programmers.
--
.
- References:
- Full life cycle development
- From: Rof
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Full life cycle development
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Full life cycle development
- Prev by Date: Re: How to express conditional dependency between components in UML?
- Next by Date: Re: Full life cycle development
- Previous by thread: Re: Full life cycle development
- Next by thread: Re: Full life cycle development
- Index(es):