comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• [ANN] SMC - State Machine Compiler v. 4.1.0
  • From: rapp
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: xmp333
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: xmp333
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: xmp333
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: xmp333
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Tim Haugton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: plan9ch7
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Composites
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: xmp333
• Re: The Agile-Oriented Paradigm (AgOP)
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Composites
  • From: kurbylogic@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Agile-Oriented Paradigm (AgOP)
  • From: salhir@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: IRC Channel for OOP?
  • From: jflowers
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: danths
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Objective criticism of inheritance
  • From: Christopher Caserio
• Component oriented software development
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: kj
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: kj
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Alright you brainiacs...
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Generate XML in an OO manner
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: sagyrozman
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: jflowers
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• IRC Channel for OOP?
  • From: jflowers
• Re: How to build a shared object using Libtool?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Juancarlo Añez
• Re: How to build a shared object using Libtool?
  • From: Cathy Hui
• How to build a shared object using Libtool?
  • From: Cathy Hui
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: C++ OOD problem - Model Loading (Graphics)
  • From: Doc O'Leary
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Visitor and Observer combined?
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: C++ OOD problem - Model Loading (Graphics)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: jason . nussbaum
• Patterns Question
  • From: danths
• C++ OOD problem - Model Loading (Graphics)
  • From: jimmy . duguay
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Juancarlo Añez
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Abhijat Vatsyayan
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Andy
• Re: Rational Rose/C++ code generation (newbie question)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: UML - modeling recursive functions with state diagrams.
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: Roger L. Cauvin
• Re: OCL translation?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML - modeling recursive functions with state diagrams.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Association Class
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• OCL translation?
  • From: karl . wettin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML - modeling recursive functions with state diagrams.
  • From: Remi Bastide
• Re: Association Class
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: UML - modeling recursive functions with state diagrams.
  • From: Someonekicked
• UML - modeling recursive functions with state diagrams.
  • From: Someonekicked
• Re: Version number of application releases
  • From: Juancarlo Añez
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Association Class
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Source code for "Object-Oriented Programming With ANSI-C"
  • From: Peng Yu
• Source code for "Object-Oriented Programming With ANSI-C"
  • From: Peng Yu
• Version number of application releases
  • From: tings
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Association Class
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Association Class
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Association Class
  • From: srini
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: What's the standard interface for a graph?
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Re: What's the standard interface for a graph?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: kirkk
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: What's the standard interface for a graph?
  • From: kj
• Re: What's the standard interface for a graph?
  • From: ggroups
• What's the standard interface for a graph?
  • From: kj
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Alright you brainiacs...
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: Phlip
• Object Circular Dependencies
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: which pattern to use...
  • From: raxitsheth
• Generate XML in an OO manner
  • From: Laila Frotjold
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• CFP - ARM 2005 - The 4th Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware
  • From: rcerq
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Designing better structures for animation tool
  • From: Darren
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Alright you brainiacs...
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Paul Sinnett
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Paul Sinnett
• Re: Designing better structures for animation tool
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Origin of the phrase "Duck Typing"
  • From: Peter Seibel
• Re: Origin of the phrase "Duck Typing"
  • From: sobering
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Alright you brainiacs...
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• A Reflective Implementation of the External Polymorphism Pattern
  • From: jflowers
• Re: Designing better structures for animation tool
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Designing better structures for animation tool
  • From: topmind
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Designing better structures for animation tool
  • From: Darren
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Alright you brainiacs...
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Paul Sinnett
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Radde
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Shashank D. Jha
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Shashank D. Jha
• Re: Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Polymorphism sucks [Was: Paradigms which way to go?]
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Diff b/w factory pattern and strategy pattern
  • From: Radde
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Origin of the phrase "Duck Typing"
  • From: John C
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall
  • From: Paul Sinnett
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Agile versus Waterfall (was: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.)
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: One use case, 2 Normal Flows!?!
  • From: piyush
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: One use case, 2 Normal Flows!?!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Shashank D. Jha
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Concurrency & real time: LASER summer school at Elba island, Italy
  • From: Volkan Arslan
• [ANN] SMC - State Machine Compiler v. 4.0.0
  • From: rapp
• One use case, 2 Normal Flows!?!
  • From: piyush
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Question about design/implementation
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Origin of the phrase "Duck Typing"
  • From: krasicki
• Question about design/implementation
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bye bye XP hello fixed price. Challenging question.
  • From: AndyW
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Object design questions
  • From: Mike
• Origin of the phrase "Duck Typing"
  • From: sobering
• Re: Object design questions
  • From: frebe
• Re: which pattern to use...
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: which pattern to use...
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Object design questions
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: which pattern to use...
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: bruno modulix
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Christopher Barber
• which pattern to use...
  • From: Yogee
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• CfP: 5th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling
  • From: Juha-Pekka Tolvanen
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: adaworks
• Re: UML: Associations between classes and packages
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML: Associations between classes and packages
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Object design questions
  • From: Mike
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Seeking a Couple Refactors
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Roy Smith
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Seeking a Couple Refactors
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Lurker
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Aquila Deus
• Re: Is JDBC driver a IoC model?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: UML: Associations between classes and packages
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: paul campbell
• Is JDBC driver a IoC model?
  • From: Sam Hwang
• Re: Will the UML ever become truly universal?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Will the UML ever become truly universal?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Will the UML ever become truly universal?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Rational Rose - Class Diagram question
  • From: Nananana
• Re: Seeking a Couple Refactors
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Template Method Variation?
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Template Method Variation?
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Bruno Desthuilliers
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Context Diagram?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Shashank D. Jha
• Terminology: Inheritance through a component
  • From: Anno Siegel
• Re: Context Diagram?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: How to express conditional dependency between components in UML?
  • From: kirkk
• Re: Functional dependencies that do not hold
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How to express conditional dependency between components in UML?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: How to express conditional dependency between components in UML?
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Seeking a Couple Refactors
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: Intellisense and the psychology of typing
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Context Diagram?
  • From: Rebecca
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Full life cycle development
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Functional dependencies that do not hold
  • From: Nabil
• Context Diagram?
  • From: Andersen
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: Template Method Overkill here?
  • From: Rich MacDonald

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > General  > comp.object  > 2005-06