comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Use Case -
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Syntax changes in UML 2.0
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Use cases question
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: scottf3095
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Syntax changes in UML 2.0
  • From: Pradyumn Sharma
• Re: Template documents
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Use Case - Commuincation Link breaks
  • From: query_me2001
• Use Case -
  • From: query_me2001
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Syntax changes in UML 2.0
  • From: Matthias Kaeppler
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Use cases question
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Adrian Hey
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: Phlip
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Jason Che-han Yip
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Jason Che-han Yip
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Jason Che-han Yip
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Jason Che-han Yip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: adaworks
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Lee Riemenschneider
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Adrian Hey
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: chuck
• Re: Template documents
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Merging beans for composite search
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Making fixtures
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: fit/FitServer
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions
  • From: Jason Che-han Yip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Template documents
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Merging beans for composite search
  • From: Francesco Vivoli
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: madhu
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: Gregory Rochford
• Paralyzed by TDD
  • From: kj
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: ggroups
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Adrian Hey
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Adrian Hey
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Adie
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Zorro
• Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
  • From: Nameless
• Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Lee Riemenschneider
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: rick . elbers
• Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Bruno Desthuilliers
• Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
  • From: topmind
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Lee Riemenschneider
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Lee Riemenschneider
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Ashima
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Ashima
• Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Merging beans for composite search
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Adrian Hey
• Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: JXStern
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming)
  • From: JXStern
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: LucasRescue
• Re: Merging beans for composite search
  • From: Francesco Vivoli
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Daniel Parker
• problem when execute test with fitnesse
  • From: Rostand
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Merging beans for composite search
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: query_me2001
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Stories in XP
  • From: Phlip
• Stories in XP
  • From: Ashima
• Problem with FitNesse
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: Interface Vs Xml....Discussion
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: Interface Vs Xml....Discussion
  • From: Frosty Madness
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Lurker
• Merging beans for composite search
  • From: Francesco Vivoli
• Interface Vs Xml....Discussion
  • From: raxitsheth
• Interface Vs Xml....Discussion
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: AndyW
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Donald Roby
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: Phlip
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Use Case Level of Detail
  • From: query_me2001
• Geese, Boats n Methods (long)
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Dave Benjamin
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Zorro
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Ramza Brown
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Language Oriented Programming
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Language Oriented Programming
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Lee Riemenschneider
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OCL translation?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: jasongorman
• Measuring OO Reuse
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Making fixtures
  • From: ggroups
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Phlip
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Mike Austin
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Ganesh J. Acharya
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Online job management - User Identification - Open Source Project
  • From: Ganesh J. Acharya
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• thoughts on OO design for processing messages
  • From: Phillip Rhodes
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Making fixtures
  • From: kj
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Mike Austin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: Shopping Cart, Pricing, Tax and Shipping
  • From: Mikito Harakiri
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Is there an end to grammar rules?
  • From: Zorro
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: Development Tools
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Zorro
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Shopping Cart, Pricing, Tax and Shipping
  • From: John
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: Paul Herber
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Brian P
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Getting Started with UML
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: fit/FitServer
  • From: Rostand
• Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams
  • From: Francesco Vivoli
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Zorro
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Getting Started with UML
  • From: Alex Vinokur
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Brian P
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Phlip
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Brian P
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: On "TDD theory"
  • From: J Krugman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: Bruno Desthuilliers
• Re: Extent of encapsulation between object types?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• On "TDD theory"
  • From: J Krugman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Extent of encapsulation between object types?
  • From: Scott Balmos
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: karl wettin
• Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams
  • From: Francesco Vivoli
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: ggroups
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel
  • From: John
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: iamfractal
• Re: Migrating to Voice User Interface----Is MVC Enabled is Helpful ....?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Migrating to Voice User Interface----Is MVC Enabled is Helpful ....?
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: Phlip
• In search for polymorphism adovacy
  • From: karl wettin
• Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Phlip
• Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Specific Database Opinion Question - Caché
  • From: Brian P
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: This stuff is too simple
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Cost and time estimative using RUP
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Isaac Gouy
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• This stuff is too simple
  • From: Phlip
• Cost and time estimative using RUP
  • From: Andre Dourado
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Is reflection OO "decent" ?
  • From: Frank
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: kraz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rich MacDonald
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies
  • From: Juancarlo Añez
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Is there metamodel for UML activity diagram defined?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Doc O'Leary
• Is there metamodel for UML activity diagram defined?
  • From: Lucia
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• HELP to use Fitnesse!!
  • From: Rostand
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: ggroups
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Test first as specification
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Test first as specification
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Architecture Types
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Architecture Types
  • From: srini
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Duplication sucks [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Classes as concepts.
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Phlip
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Classes as concepts.
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Classes as concepts.
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Jeff Brooks
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Classes as concepts.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Callbacks
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Design problem
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Doc O'Leary
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Design versus invention
  • From: Zorro
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Les Cargill
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Design versus invention
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Design problem
  • From: lionelv
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: Callbacks
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: kj
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Andreas Huber
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Shayne Wissler
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: kj
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: kj
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• State Machine/Class Granularity
  • From: Wavemaker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Design problem
  • From: Doc O'Leary
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: Callbacks
  • From: raxitsheth
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: Callbacks
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Callbacks
  • From: Tim Haughton
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: frebe
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Callbacks
  • From: srini
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Les Cargill
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Rick Elbers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Association Class
  • From: adaworks
• Design problem
  • From: Lionel
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Organizational Transformation, Organizational Improvement (Process Improvement), and Organizational Change - EIF: Beyond IDEAL
  • From: salhir@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: AndyW
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• OO Design induces an existential crisis
  • From: kj
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: leodippolito
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: leodippolito
• Re: Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: topmind
• Question regarding OOP and database access
  • From: leodippolito
• Re: Difference package/component
  • From: Marco
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: bruno modulix
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: hansewetz
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: UML: Difference package/component
  • From: Matthias Kaeppler
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: UML: Difference package/component
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes"
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Difference package/component
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: UML: Difference package/component
  • From: Michael Feathers
• UML: Difference package/component
  • From: Matthias Kaeppler
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: Matthias Kaeppler
• Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• How to correctly model API dependencies in UML
  • From: Matthias Kaeppler
• Re: Patterns Question
  • From: paul campbell
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alan Gauld
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Chris Hanson
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: From algorithms to patterns
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• From algorithms to patterns
  • From: learningOO
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: krasicki
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Phlip
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: topmind
• Re: Association Class
  • From: Michael Feathers
• Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Almad
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Olav.NET
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Simon Smith
• Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Shane Mingins
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Is there MVC patter in web-applications
  • From: Olav.NET
• Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?)
  • From: Robert C . Martin

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)