Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy



On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:00:08 -0400, "Daniel Parker"
<danielaparker@spam?nothanks.windupbird.com> wrote:

>I think the criticism is of writing which is largely polemical, and I think
>it would be fair to put much of the writing by XP proponents in this
>category. A good test would be to check whether the author treats XP as if
>it were the one and only methodology that has no problems, and a good number
>of articles on the subject appear to fall into this category.

Does it? Oh I agree that there are some over-enthusiastic blurbs
written here and there. But where are the serious articles and books
that treat XP as a discipline that has no problems? Certainly the
primary XP books don't fall into that category. Nor do the articles
by the original proponents. While I would agree that there have been
certain excesses of enthusiasm amongst the original proponents (and I
have been as guilty as any), none of us has claimed silver-bullet
status for XP/Agile.

>It's hard to
>find blogs that dissect both successful and unsuccessful XP projects and
>systematically discuss the consequences of the various practices, which is
>what you'd expect if the author wanted to be taken seriously.

I'm astounded. There has been a rather large amount of critical and
thoughtful writing about XP/Agile in the magazines and newsgroups.
Folks have tried it this way and that, and have commented on how the
practices apply to them and their situations. Whole books have been
published with the research data on certain practices.

> Instead, you
>get pictures of happy programmers on the cover of Software Development
>magazine, links to projects that seem to go dead after a while, and links to
>puff pieces.

You also get links to projects that are succeeding and continue to
succeed, as well as articles in Dr. Dobbs about the problems of
XP/Agile, and links to critical and thoughtful discussions on many
blogs and newsgroups.

>None of this is anti-XP; it's just that evangelical writing
>tends to come across as a little bit silly when presented to a professional
>audience.

So does anti-writing; especially when it isn't based on any kind of
facts.
-----
Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) | email: unclebob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Object Mentor Inc. | blog: www.butunclebob.com
The Agile Transition Experts | web: www.objectmentor.com
800-338-6716


"The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom,
but to set a limit to infinite error."
-- Bertolt Brecht, Life of Galileo
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Experimental collaboration
    ... Creative Writing who has sent anything in here. ... quality of criticism here, to see if there are fresh perspectives they ... any motivated students with access to Word Processing ... contributions were concerned. ...
    (uk.culture.arts.writing)
  • Re: META/POLL: The Purpose of Criticism
    ... in any way to your own ability to withstand criticism. ... The implication was that you made comments about my writing that could ... "interchangable plot puppets" and, in the same thread, that my ... I also have a problem with the fact that Martin Rock has spent his ...
    (rec.arts.comics.creative)
  • Re: 500 Crit Limit: -- Why?
    ... There are talented people here but their writing has stagnated. ... I just dropped in to see what was up and suddenly it's a perfect post-storm largely from someone I've not seen before, whose credentials I don't know, and who has a really amateur notion of both criticism and creation. ... Here's one of the reviews. ... Every character, from Emperor aesthete to nomad barbarian, speaks with a chopped, elliptical diction worthy of a Western Union telegram. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Roots-Key Special Issue Winter 2007
    ... issue, "Recreating Your Ancestral Shtetl", in December, 2007. ... Daniel Wagner and Israel Pickholtz, writing from Israel. ... past and build a bridge to the future, with articles by Joyce Field, ...
    (soc.genealogy.jewish)
  • Re: HTML textbook recommendations
    ... The word on your web site ... >>> also need some help with punctuation. ... > You also brought up writing a book. ... *constructive* criticism and saw nothing constructive in your criticism ...
    (alt.html)