Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: "frebe" <fredrik_bertilsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jul 2005 07:38:59 -0700
> The vendor raised the licensing rate and they
> simply could not make money with the product.
There are many free RDBMS availible.
> The team wished that they could break the dependencies on the vendor
Just keep to ANSI SQL and you will be able to change database vendor at
any time. The applications I currently work with, are database vendor
independent without separating the database schema from the GUI or
"business" logic. Using ANSI SQL the database schema are already
separated from the database vendor.
Fredrik Bertilsson
http://butler.sourceforge.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- References:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Michael Feathers
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: Design versus invention
- Next by Date: Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Index(es):