Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:51:57 GMT
frebe wrote:
> How would the DTD for your XML look like? If you want to find all
> customers that ordered a given part, how would you implement that
> search? How would you do to check that only existing PartNo are entered
> by the user?
You are asking how to make XML behave like SQL. That's a different question,
and _yes_ there is more work involved.
Regardless of the extra code to support queries in XML, we don't want this
change to drag down the rest of our modules. The change should be isolated
to the Persistence Layer.
And do you persist in claiming that coupling to SQL is less odious than all
the other couplings we seek to defeat??
Michael Feathers wrote:
> This does happen ;-)
Changed my mind, Holmes. XML is too last-millenium...
Now I want YAML.
Sorry.
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- References:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Michael Feathers
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Michael Feathers
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Next by Date: Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy]
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|