Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: "Phlip" <phlip_cpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 05:49:41 GMT
frebe wrote:
> The question is if really need switchability between different data
> paradigms. In history there have been three -hierachical, network and
> relational. All but relational is obsolete. There might come new
> paradigms, but it seem to take at least 10-20 years between every
> generation. As pointed out in my answer to Feathers it is impossible to
> know how a future paradigm would affect the application structure, so
> trying to prefare for an unknown future in this case, is just wast of
> money.
So you are saying that the paradigm can couple out to the other modules,
even when the actual technology is insulated. Fair enough.
> Once we identified the need for a RDBMS in an application, we can be
> resonable sure that a RDBMS could be used during the entire life-cycle
> of the application.
Hope for the best, prepare for the worst. ;-)
--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- References:
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: topmind
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Michael Feathers
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Michael Feathers
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: frebe
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Prev by Date: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Next by Date: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Next by thread: Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- Index(es):