Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: <adaworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:09:05 GMT
"Zorro" <zorabi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122352773.386478.163510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> The problem, in my opinion is its lack of support for the notion of
> Global Space, and insisting on absolute view of object-orientation.
> Well, not everything is an object. How about a small global function
> that prints "Hello World"? Does this really have to be a method of some
> class? Should object-oriented view completely disregard functional view
> (in that, only methods are allowed)?
>
I do my object-oriented programming in Ada and I do not find myself
overwhelmed by the limitations you describe. Ada gives me the flexibility
I need when there is a need for a relaxing the strict guidelines of OOP,
allows me to select OOP at any level of functionality I find appropriate
for the creation of my solution space, and gives me the ability to leverage
the full range of checking a compiler ought to do in helping me to reduce
the number of errors I make in the early stages of my design and
programming.
Sometimes it is a simple as choosing good tools.
Richard Riehle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- References:
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Nameless
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Prev by Date: Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- Next by Date: Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
- Previous by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Next by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|