Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: "Tim Haughton" <timhaughton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 06:24:36 GMT
<adaworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:apYFe.1264$iM7.271@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I find OOP to be a valuable tool for development in a large number of
> circumstances. I find it annoying when it prevents me for creating
> simple solutions to problems that need simple solutions. Inheritance,
> when appropriate has not substitute. Generics (templates) when
> appropriate are an excellent way to create reusable components.
> I don't design my software with "go to" but I reserve the right to
> use it when it - albeit infrequently - is the right thing to do. Global
> data is a dangerous feature of most programs, but sometimes it is
> the right thing to do.
Please refrain from making such pragmatic posts in this group. If I could
refer you to the group FAQ, it states that you should adopt an unflinchingly
polarised view point and stick to it come hell or high water. ;¬)
--
Regards,
Tim Haughton
Agitek
http://agitek.co.uk
http://blogitek.com/timhaughton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- References:
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Nameless
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- Next by Date: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Next by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Index(es):