Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: "Zorro" <zorabi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jul 2005 00:56:39 -0700
I do not think that is the correct link. It is OK. Perhaps someone
reading this message will tell us about it.
I am assuming (perhaps incorrectly) there is a general way to reach the
FAQ for any public group. If anyone could help with this, I would
appreciate it.
> There's me being sarcastic and now you're actually asking me to think.
There is nothing wrong with the wording of your comment. Each group has
guidelines and should be followed.
Thanks,
Z.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Tim Haughton
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- References:
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Nameless
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Thomas Gagne
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Tim Haughton
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Tim Haughton
- Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- Next by Date: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Next by thread: Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
