Syntax changes in UML 2.0

Hi,

I was wondering what was the reason to change the syntax for components in UML2? I don't see any real improvements and even think the old one (which is now deprecated) was more expressive (you could separate a component from e.g. a class by its shape, now you have to look at the stereotype).

Just curious.

--
Matthias Kaeppler
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Betovs notation
    ... That might apply to RosAsm... ... >:)) You just give the reason why an Assembler should NEVER ... That's not Nasm syntax, maybe it's LuxAsm syntax... ... > the readability, ... ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Need help with a Work around
    ... The reason for the _access is because everythign I have been reading it ... overwrite data in a file where the file may be saveable. ... I start reading the material and actually see code in use and study it to ... right when I tried doing it myself but had the wrong syntax. ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • RE: Error 3065- cannot execute select query
    ... the reason it wasn't getting an error is because I commented out the line ... > The syntax as posted is for a numeric field: ... >> Dim rs As DAO.Recordset ... >> "(tblPanelJob INNER JOIN tblPanelJobDetail ON ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: How to rearrange text fields in sed?
    ... for the same reason: legibility. ... There may be a reason for using more idiomatic syntax in an ... because it may execute faster. ... Shell Scripting Recipes: | My code in this post, if any, ...
    (comp.unix.questions)
  • Re: About those parenthesis....
    ... The above is no longer strictly prefix notation. ... >> I have programmed with Lisp-like semantics using the fsyntax. ... I don't see any reason why that utterance has to be ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)