comp.object

Date Index

Use Case - Commuincation Link breaks, query_me2001
Use Case -, query_me2001
- Re: Use Case -, H. S. Lahman
Syntax changes in UML 2.0, Matthias Kaeppler
- Re: Syntax changes in UML 2.0, Pradyumn Sharma
- Re: Syntax changes in UML 2.0, H. S. Lahman
Use cases question, Antonio Santiago
- Re: Use cases question, H. S. Lahman
Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Jason Che-han Yip
- Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, iamfractal
  - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, chuck
  - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Jason Che-han Yip
- Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Jason Che-han Yip
- Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, hansewetz
  - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Jason Che-han Yip
    - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, hansewetz
- Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, Jason Che-han Yip
- Re: Repositories, package dependencies, and domain-flavoured exceptions, paul campbell
Template documents, Antonio Santiago
- Re: Template documents, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Template documents, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Paralyzed by TDD, kj
- Re: Paralyzed by TDD, Gregory Rochford
- Re: Paralyzed by TDD, Ilja Preuß
  - Re: Paralyzed by TDD, Phlip
    - Re: Paralyzed by TDD, jasongorman
    - Re: Paralyzed by TDD, Phlip
- Re: Paralyzed by TDD, Alvin Ryder
Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Nameless
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
  - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Thomas Gagne
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, adaworks
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, adaworks
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, adaworks
    - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Frosty Madness
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, JXStern
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, madhu
  - Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Zorro
- Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?, Ilja Preuß
Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Patrick May
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Bruno Desthuilliers
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Patrick May
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', iamfractal
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', JXStern
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', ggroups
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', iamfractal
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Isaac Gouy
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Adie
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', hansewetz
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Patrick May
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Frosty Madness
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Patrick May
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Frosty Madness
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Patrick May
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Frosty Madness
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Frosty Madness
    - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Phlip
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Zorro
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', Alvin Ryder
- Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', jasongorman
  - Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil', topmind
problem when execute test with fitnesse, Rostand
Stories in XP, Ashima
- Re: Stories in XP, Phlip
- Re: Stories in XP, Daniel Parker
  - Re: Stories in XP, Phlip
    - Re: Stories in XP, Daniel Parker
  - Re: Stories in XP, Ashima
    - Re: Stories in XP, Phlip
    - Re: Stories in XP, Ashima
    - Re: Stories in XP, Phlip
    - Re: Stories in XP, Ilja Preuß
- Re: Stories in XP, Ilja Preuß
Problem with FitNesse, Frosty Madness
Merging beans for composite search, Francesco Vivoli
- Re: Merging beans for composite search, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Merging beans for composite search, Francesco Vivoli
    - Re: Merging beans for composite search, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Merging beans for composite search, Francesco Vivoli
    - Re: Merging beans for composite search, H. S. Lahman
Interface Vs Xml....Discussion, raxitsheth
- Re: Interface Vs Xml....Discussion, Frosty Madness
  - Re: Interface Vs Xml....Discussion, raxitsheth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Interface Vs Xml....Discussion, raxitsheth
Use Case Level of Detail, query_me2001
- Re: Use Case Level of Detail, Phlip
- Re: Use Case Level of Detail, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Use Case Level of Detail, AndyW
  - Re: Use Case Level of Detail, query_me2001
    - Re: Use Case Level of Detail, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Use Case Level of Detail, Phlip
    - Re: Use Case Level of Detail, AndyW
    - Re: Use Case Level of Detail, Phlip
Geese, Boats n Methods (long), AndyW
Language Oriented Programming, raxitsheth
- Re: Language Oriented Programming, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  - Re: Language Oriented Programming, raxitsheth
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Dave Benjamin
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Bjorn Reese
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Language Oriented Programming, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Language Oriented Programming, raxitsheth
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Language Oriented Programming, JXStern
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, JXStern
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Language Oriented Programming, Daniel Parker
    - Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), JXStern
    - Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), JXStern
    - Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), JXStern
    - Re: Performance optimization vs satisficing (was Language Oriented Programming), H. S. Lahman
- Re: Language Oriented Programming, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: Language Oriented Programming, scottf3095
Re: OCL translation?, jasongorman
Measuring OO Reuse, jasongorman
- Re: Measuring OO Reuse, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, jasongorman
- Re: Measuring OO Reuse, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, jasongorman
    - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Measuring OO Reuse, hansewetz
  - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, jasongorman
    - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, Phlip
    - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, hansewetz
- Re: Measuring OO Reuse, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: Measuring OO Reuse, Phlip
Online job management - User Identification - Open Source Project, Ganesh J. Acharya
thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
- Message not available
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
    - Message not available
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
    - Message not available
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
    - Message not available
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Ilja Preuß
    - Message not available
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Tim Haughton
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, AndyW
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, AndyW
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Ilja Preuß
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Ilja Preuß
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Mike Austin
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, paul campbell
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Patrick May
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, iamfractal
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Adrian Hey
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Adrian Hey
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Adrian Hey
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Adrian Hey
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Adrian Hey
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Phillip Rhodes
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, AndyW
- Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages, Robert C . Martin
Making fixtures, kj
- Re: Making fixtures, ggroups
- Re: Making fixtures, Robert C . Martin
Is there an end to grammar rules?, Zorro
- Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Phlip
  - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Zorro
  - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Zorro
- Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Zorro
    - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Thomas Gagne
  - Re: Is there an end to grammar rules?, Zorro
Shopping Cart, Pricing, Tax and Shipping, John
- Re: Shopping Cart, Pricing, Tax and Shipping, Mikito Harakiri
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: fit/FitServer, Rostand
- Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: fit/FitServer, Robert C . Martin
Getting Started with UML, Alex Vinokur
- Re: Getting Started with UML, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
- Re: Getting Started with UML, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
  - Re: Getting Started with UML, Paul Herber
- Re: Getting Started with UML, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Getting Started with UML, Development Tools
- Re: Getting Started with UML, jasongorman
On "TDD theory", J Krugman
- Re: On "TDD theory", J Krugman
  - Re: On "TDD theory", Andrew McDonagh
  - Re: On "TDD theory", Robert C . Martin
    - Re: On "TDD theory", jasongorman
    - Re: On "TDD theory", Robert C . Martin
- Re: On "TDD theory", Ilja Preuß
  - Re: On "TDD theory", Phillip Rhodes
    - Re: On "TDD theory", Ilja Preuß
Extent of encapsulation between object types?, Scott Balmos
- Re: Extent of encapsulation between object types?, H. S. Lahman
Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams, Francesco Vivoli
- Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams, Francesco Vivoli
    - Re: Inheritance and UML sequence diagrams, H. S. Lahman
Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
- Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
  - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
- Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, John
    - Re: Converting a number of objects to XML, HTML or Excel, H. S. Lahman
Migrating to Voice User Interface----Is MVC Enabled is Helpful ....?, raxitsheth
- Re: Migrating to Voice User Interface----Is MVC Enabled is Helpful ....?, Phlip
In search for polymorphism adovacy, karl wettin
- Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, Phlip
  - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, karl wettin
    - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, Phlip
    - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, Robert C . Martin
- Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, iamfractal
  - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, paul campbell
    - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, Bruno Desthuilliers
    - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, paul campbell
    - Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, iamfractal
- Re: In search for polymorphism adovacy, H. S. Lahman
Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Alvin Ryder
- Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Phlip
  - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Phlip
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Brian P
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Phlip
- Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Thomas Gagne
- Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
  - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, paul campbell
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
- Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Lee Riemenschneider
  - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Lee Riemenschneider
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Alvin Ryder
  - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Lee Riemenschneider
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Lee Riemenschneider
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Lee Riemenschneider
    - Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you, Zorro
Specific Database Opinion Question - Caché, Brian P
This stuff is too simple, Phlip
- Re: This stuff is too simple, krasicki
- Re: This stuff is too simple, Daniel Parker
- Re: This stuff is too simple, iamfractal
- Re: This stuff is too simple, hansewetz
  - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
- Re: This stuff is too simple, Ramza Brown
  - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, Lurker
- Re: This stuff is too simple, Zorro
  - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, Zorro
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, Donald Roby
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
- Re: This stuff is too simple, topmind
  - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
- Re: This stuff is too simple, LucasRescue
  - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, hansewetz
    - Re: This stuff is too simple, Phlip
Cost and time estimative using RUP, Andre Dourado
- Re: Cost and time estimative using RUP, AndyW
Is reflection OO "decent" ?, Frank
- Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?, Phlip
- Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?, Laurent Bossavit
  - Re: Is reflection OO "decent" ?, Phlip
Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies, Juancarlo Añez
  - Re: Querying data associated with hierarchies, H. S. Lahman
Is there metamodel for UML activity diagram defined?, Lucia
- Re: Is there metamodel for UML activity diagram defined?, H. S. Lahman
HELP to use Fitnesse!!, Rostand
Test first as specification, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Test first as specification, Michael Feathers
- Re: Test first as specification, Tim Haughton
- Re: Test first as specification, Alvin Ryder
  - Re: Test first as specification, Tim Haughton
    - Re: Test first as specification, Alvin Ryder
- Re: Test first as specification, Phlip
  - Re: Test first as specification, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Test first as specification, Robert C . Martin
Architecture Types, srini
- Re: Architecture Types, raxitsheth
Re: Classes as concepts., H. S. Lahman
- Re: Classes as concepts., Rick Elbers
  - Re: Classes as concepts., Phlip
    - Re: Classes as concepts., Rick Elbers
Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
- Re: Design versus invention, Zorro
- Re: Design versus invention, Rick Elbers
  - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
- Re: Design versus invention, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Design versus invention, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Design versus invention, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Design versus invention, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Design versus invention, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Design versus invention, paul campbell
  - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
  - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Design versus invention, raxitsheth
    - Re: Design versus invention, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: Design versus invention, raxitsheth
- Re: Design versus invention, Zorro
State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
- Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Andreas Huber
- Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
  - Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, raxitsheth
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: Ambiguities of the Harel/UML FSM model, Andreas Huber
  - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: State Machine/Class Granularity, Wavemaker
Callbacks, srini
- Re: Callbacks, Tim Haughton
- Re: Callbacks, Laurent Bossavit
- Re: Callbacks, raxitsheth
- Re: Callbacks, Jon Harrop
- Re: Callbacks, H. S. Lahman
Design problem, Lionel
- Re: Design problem, Doc O'Leary
  - Re: Design problem, lionelv
    - Re: Design problem, Doc O'Leary
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
    - Re: Design problem, Doc O'Leary
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
- Re: Design problem, Rick Elbers
- Re: Design problem, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: Design problem, Lionel
- Re: Design problem, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: Design problem, Lionel
    - Re: Design problem, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
    - Re: Design problem, Phlip
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
    - Re: Design problem, Phlip
    - Re: Design problem, Lionel
Organizational Transformation, Organizational Improvement (Process Improvement), and Organizational Change - EIF: Beyond IDEAL, salhir@xxxxxxxxxxx
OO Design induces an existential crisis, kj
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Phlip
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Phlip
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Jeff Brooks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Jeff Brooks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Bjorn Reese
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, rick . elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Bjorn Reese
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, kj
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, ggroups
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rich MacDonald
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, adaworks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, krasicki
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Alvin Ryder
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Berislav Lopac
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, kj
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, kj
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Phlip
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Shayne Wissler
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Jeff Brooks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Jeff Brooks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, H. S. Lahman
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Robert C . Martin
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, paul campbell
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Phlip
  - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Rick Elbers
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, topmind
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Mike Austin
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, adaworks
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, AndyW
    - Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, hansewetz
- Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Question regarding OOP and database access, leodippolito
- Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, topmind
  - Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, leodippolito
    - Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, Phlip
    - Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, leodippolito
    - Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, Phlip
    - Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, topmind
- Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, H. S. Lahman
- Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, Daniel Parker
- Re: Question regarding OOP and database access, frebe
Re: Code smell? Factory object with multiple "modes", Nick Malik [Microsoft]
UML: Difference package/component, Matthias Kaeppler
- Re: UML: Difference package/component, Michael Feathers
- Re: Difference package/component, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: Difference package/component, Marco
- Re: UML: Difference package/component, H. S. Lahman
- Re: UML: Difference package/component, Matthias Kaeppler
How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, Matthias Kaeppler
- Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, H. S. Lahman
  - Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, Matthias Kaeppler
    - Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, H. S. Lahman
- Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, Phlip
- Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: How to correctly model API dependencies in UML, bruno modulix
Re: Patterns Question, paul campbell
From algorithms to patterns, learningOO
- Re: From algorithms to patterns, H. S. Lahman
Re: Association Class, Michael Feathers
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Association Class, adaworks
Re: parallel Inheritance of classes, O-O master needed!, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, H. S. Lahman
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Les Cargill
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Les Cargill
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, H. S. Lahman
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Thomas Gagne
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Thomas Gagne
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Thomas Gagne
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Brian P
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Brian P
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Thomas Gagne
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Rick Elbers
    - Duplication sucks [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy], Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alvin Ryder
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Shane Mingins
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Shane Mingins
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, frebe
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Alan Gauld
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Laurent Bossavit
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy], Phlip
    - Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy], hansewetz
    - Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy], Phlip
    - Re: If you can't test it, you must plan it [Was: OOP/OOD Philosophy], hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Michael Feathers
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, kraz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, krasicki
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Message not available
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Daniel Parker
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, jasongorman
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Message not available
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Message not available
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Phlip
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, hansewetz
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Ilja Preuß
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
  - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, topmind
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Mark Nicholls
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, ggroups
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Robert C . Martin
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
    - Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Isaac Gouy
- Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy, Ganesh J. Acharya
Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Olav.NET
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Alvin Ryder
  - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Olav.NET
    - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Almad
    - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, topmind
    - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Alvin Ryder
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Phlip
  - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, topmind
    - Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Phlip
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Shane Mingins
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Simon Smith
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Chris Hanson
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Berislav Lopac
- Re: Is there MVC patter in web-applications, Robert C . Martin
Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
- Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
  - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
  - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Robert C . Martin
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
- Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Daniel Parker
  - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Daniel Parker
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), Daniel Parker
    - Re: UML Question (Object <-> ObjectFinder?), H. S. Lahman