comp.object

Thread Index

Re: I think I need to jar my thinking vs a global object
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Object, thing, creature, and methods...???
- From: Phlip
Coordination in OO
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: ggroups
Object, thing, creature, and methods...???
- From: Robert Bralic
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
I think I need to jar my thinking vs a global object
- From: Charles Krug
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Roy Smith
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ron Jeffries
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers
Re: Some questions about inheritance
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers
Re: Some questions about inheritance
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Some questions about inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Testability and class overhead
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
State pattern in the context of interface cohesion
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: Some questions about inheritance
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Some questions about inheritance
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: topmind
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Bjorn Reese
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Some questions about inheritance
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Jon Harrop
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: paul campbell
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Testability and class overhead
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Lurker
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: iamfractal
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Brad
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Jon Harrop
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Patrick May
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: C++ implementation for C API ---- converting legacy C code to C++
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: C++ implementation for C API ---- converting legacy C code to C++
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Testability and class overhead
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Patrick May
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: Survey Invitation (Please give urgent attention!!)
- From: jasongorman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: bruno modulix
Re: Lightweight application??
- From: HoopsBhoy
Re: Lightweight application??
- From: iamfractal
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: C++ implementation for C API ---- converting legacy C code to C++
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: precondition and postcondition
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Lightweight application??
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: C++ implementation for C API ---- converting legacy C code to C++
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Lightweight application??
- From: HoopsBhoy
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: precondition and postcondition
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: ggroups
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Lightweight application??
- From: Brad
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Brad
Free Requirement Management and Use Case Software
- From: darrenjlevy
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: Henk Verhoeven
Survey Invitation (Please give urgent attention!!)
- From: MauliK
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: frebe
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Patrick May
Lightweight application??
- From: hoopsbhoy67
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: extern invariant and intern invariant
- From: ggroups
extern invariant and intern invariant
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Brad
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: paul campbell
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
Re: precondition and postcondition
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Coding Standards: Response to Roger L. Cauvin
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
precondition and postcondition
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Coding Standards: Response to Roger L. Cauvin
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Steven Woody
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: ggroups
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Hans
Re: Confusion With Inheritance
- From: iamfractal
Confusion With Inheritance
- From: Brad
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Alvin Ryder
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Coding Standards: Response to Roger L. Cauvin
- From: kk_oop
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: paul campbell
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: kk_oop
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: kk_oop
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: paul campbell
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: kk_oop
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Roy Smith
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: kk_oop
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: kk_oop
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: kk_oop
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: JXStern
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: iamfractal
Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Ilja Preu�
XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Need public state queries for State Pattern?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Power of OOD, silver bullet and you
- From: adaworks
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: ggroups
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Need public state queries for State Pattern?
- From: kk_oop
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: ggroups
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers
Re: OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: Alvin Ryder
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: bruno modulix
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Embarcadero Describe tool and uml 2.0 metamodel
- From: Juergen Wuest
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Re: Test first as specification
- From: LucasRescue
Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Embarcadero Describe tool and uml 2.0 metamodel
- From: vicbelma
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
RUP: Can I Implement a Use-Case Partially?
- From: Steven Woody
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Test first as specification
- From: adaworks
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: *Real* Distributed Computing
- From: AndyW
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: *Real* Distributed Computing
- From: Tim Tyler
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: *Real* Distributed Computing
- From: AndyW
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Best way to seperate DAOs
- From: kirkk
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: *Real* Distributed Computing
- From: Isaac Gouy
Best way to seperate DAOs
- From: mdjj
Re: This stuff is too simple
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: raf
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: UML Views and Models - what the difference
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: How do i represent multithread application in a UML state diagram
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Smells versus beauty
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: OO design examples
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: caching object ?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Bjorn Reese
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: shiv_koirala
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
OCL question
- From: Srinivas Nedunuri
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: UML Views and Models - what the difference
- From: Kav
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Tim Haughton
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Martijn Meijering
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: paul campbell
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: paul campbell
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Jon Harrop
Re: UML Views and Models - what the difference
- From: jasongorman
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Decorator or Factory Pattern
- From: thinkmind
Re: OO design examples
- From: Beartamer
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
UML Views and Models - what the difference
- From: darrenw
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Tim Haughton
Re: XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: jasongorman
XP Question: Stories and Index Cards
- From: Ashima
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: theinvisibleGhost
How do i represent multithread application in a UML state diagram
- From: vanisathish
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: kk_oop
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: *Real* Distributed Computing
- From: AndyW
Testability and class overhead
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: jasongorman
Re: State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: jasongorman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Andrew McDonagh
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: TDD sucks [Was: 'Snake Oil']
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: jason
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Jon Harrop
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: OO design examples
- From: Rich MacDonald
Re: TDD sucks [Was: 'Snake Oil']
- From: Rich MacDonald
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
State Pattern: Where to put shared behavior?
- From: kk_oop
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: ggroups
Re: Test first as specification
- From: ggroups
Re: Singleton Pattern
- From: Tim Haughton
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Paralyzed by TDD
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Singleton Pattern
- From: theinvisibleGhost
Re: OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: Kav
Re: OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: topmind
Re: OO design examples
- From: Jon Harrop
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Paralyzed by TDD
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: rmoldskr+usenet
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
OO and RDBMS design decision
- From: Rich
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Lurker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Requirement taxonomy
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: TDD sucks [Was: 'Snake Oil']
- From: Phlip
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: TDD sucks [Was: 'Snake Oil']
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OO design examples
- From: EventHelix.com
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Lurker
OO design examples
- From: Beartamer
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
TDD sucks [Was: 'Snake Oil']
- From: Phlip
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: raxitsheth
Re: caching object ?
- From: gabriel
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Regarding IO, OO-design and Encapsulation
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Standard UML to Java binding ?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Andreas Awenius
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Regarding IO, OO-design and Encapsulation
- From: Rasmus Kromann-Larsen
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: rmoldskr+usenet
Re: Standard UML to Java binding ?
- From: jasongorman
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: jasongorman
Re: Standard UML to Java binding ?
- From: Rémi Bastide
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: ggroups
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: caching object ?
- From: JXStern
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Standard UML to Java binding ?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: caching object ?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: caching object ?
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: caching object ?
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: caching object ?
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: caching object ?
- From: gabriel
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Standard UML to Java binding ?
- From: Rémi Bastide
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Stories in XP
- From: scottf3095
Re: caching object ?
- From: JXStern
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
caching object ?
- From: gabriel
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Intel Inside
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: kevin cline
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Rich MacDonald
Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Phlip
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Matthias Kaeppler
Re: Is OOP a paradigm or methodology?
- From: Matthias Kaeppler
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Thomas Gagne
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: ggroups
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: topmind
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Workflow Patterns
- From: danths
Workflow Patterns
- From: danths
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: paul campbell
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: problem when execute test with fitnesse
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Stories in XP
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: ggroups
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: ggroups
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: ggroups
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Michael Feathers
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: OOP/OOD Philosophy
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: AndyW
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Phlip
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: Test first as specification
- From: paul campbell
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Use Case Level of Detail
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Mike Austin
Re: Paralyzed by TDD
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: Test first as specification
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Phlip
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: Use cases question
- From: jasongorman
Re: Use Case - Commuincation Link breaks
- From: jasongorman
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Language Oriented Programming
- From: Lurker
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: topmind
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Ramza Brown
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Phlip
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Ilja Preu�
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: hansewetz
Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Ramza Brown
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: adaworks
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Newbie - Design Document
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Newbie - Design Document
- From: lakepeir
Re: Use Case -
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: AndyW
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: hansewetz
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: OO Design induces an existential crisis
- From: adaworks
Re: thoughts on OO design for processing messages
- From: Adrian Hey