Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: "Phlip" <phlipcpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:05:18 GMT
Davor wrote:
> How do you evaluate OOA and OOD models? In particular what do you
> perceive as a "high-quality model" for each (OOA, OOD)?
By how well the model participates in implementing source code that passes
all tests, is clear and expressive, duplicates no behaviors, and has minimal
classes, methods, & lines.
The question of evaluating a model in isolation from code is useless. What
would you do if the model evaluated as wonderful but the resulting code
sucked? Is that a useful evaluation?
> (Note, please don't equate OOA with "high-level design" for the
> purposes of this post, but rather something that helps us understand
> and analyze problem domain.
In which case why is it OO (meaning leveraging objects with polymorphic
methods behind narrow interfaces)?
--
Phlip
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
- Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- References:
- defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- From: Davor
- defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- Prev by Date: Re: Language Oriented Programming
- Next by Date: Re: Bitwise Mag editorial calls OOP 'Snake Oil'
- Previous by thread: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- Next by thread: Re: defining quality of OOA and OOD models
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|