Re: Test first as specification

Daniel,

> > "Specifying by tests" sounds a bit more ambitious, and ambiguous.
>
> But you suggest otherwise in your response to Paul Campbell.

I asked Paul a clarifying question; I don't know what you think I
"suggested".

Laurent
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Likert item construction
    ... I am not entirely certain I understood your response. ... never seen "intermittent" labels, which would be just the opposite. ... Paul Campbell ...
    (sci.psychology.research)
  • Re: Test first as specification
    ... >> But you suggest otherwise in your response to Paul Campbell. ... > I asked Paul a clarifying question; I don't know what you think I ... non-trivial programming language entirely through tests. ... Daniel Parker ...
    (comp.object)