Re: XP and Pair Programming

Daniel Parker wrote:

> The only thing we can say for sure is that pair programming does not
> seem to be catching on, it appears to be no more popular today than
> five years ago, perhaps even less so.

Ah, the clarity of agenda-oriented speculation, uncluttered by any kind of
evidence.

Try this:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22pair+programming%22

The search returns about 86,000 hits.

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP and Pair Programming
    ... Phlip wrote: ... >> The only thing we can say for sure is that pair programming does not ... Daniel Parker ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: XP Requirement Analysis?
    ... Daniel Parker wrote: ... he posts a lot) on pair programming not always been mandatory. ... RCM said that not every single line of code might need a pair! ...
    (comp.object)