Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: "Nick Malik [Microsoft]" <nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:10:57 -0700
> No agenda, just casual empiricism. Perhaps a better indicator would be
> to take a straw vote on a few of the comp programming newsgroups and
> take a count.
Oh, yeah... THAT'S scientific :-)
Better to poll readers of a general purpose programming magazine.
So I went looking for just such a poll. Didn't find it. If anyone knows of
a general purpose programming magazine that has done a poll on agile
methods, please let me know.
Along the way, I found an interesting article. The military conducted an
experiment of using pair programming, and measured the result.
http://www.stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/2003/03/jensen.html
Excerpts
"We hoped for a productivity gain of anything greater than 0 percent. Any
small gain would have compensated for the two programmers loading on each
task. The 127 percent gain achieved was phenomenal and a cause for
celebration."
"The error analysis showed the project had achieved an error rate that was
three orders of magnitude less than normal for the organization. Integration
of the first two components (approximately 10,000 source lines) was
completed with only two coding errors and one design error. "
--
--- Nick Malik [Microsoft]
MCSD, CFPS, Certified Scrummaster
http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this forum are my own, and not
representative of my employer.
I do not answer questions on behalf of my employer. I'm just a
programmer helping programmers.
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Isaac Gouy
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- References:
- XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|