Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: "Daniel Parker" <danielaparker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2005 11:27:58 -0700
Nick Malik [Microsoft] wrote:
> > No agenda, just casual empiricism. Perhaps a better indicator would be
> > to take a straw vote on a few of the comp programming newsgroups and
> > take a count.
>
> Oh, yeah... THAT'S scientific :-)
>
> Better to poll readers of a general purpose programming magazine.
>
I don't think that would work. There are very few programming
magazines left, and their readers would likely be unrepresentative.
> So I went looking for just such a poll. Didn't find it. If anyone knows of
> a general purpose programming magazine that has done a poll on agile
> methods, please let me know.
>
I think you'd have to pick a random sampling of firms, and poll
development managers. But probably nobody has the inclination to do
that :-)
I would be surprised if more than one half of one percent of
programmers practiced pair programming on a regular basis. I suspect
it's much less.
-- Daniel
.
- References:
- XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by Date: Lightweight application??
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|