Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:33:17 -0500
Nick Malik [Microsoft] <nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "The error analysis showed the project had achieved an error rate that was
> three orders of magnitude less than normal for the organization. Integration
> of the first two components (approximately 10,000 source lines) was
> completed with only two coding errors and one design error. "
Three orders of magnitude? Were they actually expecting two thousand coding
errors and one thousand design errors in 10k SLOC or are they merely
misusing the term?
--
Leif Roar Moldskred
Got Sfik?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- References:
- XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Lightweight application??
- Next by Date: Re: chooses not to generate code at all
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|