Re: XP and Pair Programming


Leif Roar Moldskred wrote:
> Nick Malik [Microsoft] <nickmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "The error analysis showed the project had achieved an error rate that was
> > three orders of magnitude less than normal for the organization. Integration
> > of the first two components (approximately 10,000 source lines) was
> > completed with only two coding errors and one design error. "
>
> Three orders of magnitude? Were they actually expecting two thousand coding
> errors and one thousand design errors in 10k SLOC or are they merely
> misusing the term?
>
I'm also having some trouble with this sentence:

"The remaining three components had more errors, but the number of
errors for these components was significantly less than normal."

-- Daniel

.