Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit <laurent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:31:28 +0200
Lahman,
> Like waterfalls, the difference between your "static" The Review and
> pair review is a matter of scale, not some fundamental philosophical
> difference.
I'm not sure I get what you're saying here. You seem to be saying "It
doesn't matter whether one is doing one day of reviewing each month, or
two hundred mini-reviews of one minute each in an iteration - it's just
the same amount of review."
I would *bet* that to any external observer, the difference would appear
to be quite significant, whether or not they called it a "fundamental
philosophical difference".
Doing one review a month vs. two hundred per iteration might, for
instance, make some difference in how people's reviewing skills improve
over time.
Laurent
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- References:
- XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Some questions about inheritance
- Next by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
