Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: "Phlip" <phlipcpp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:54:24 GMT
Laurent Bossavit wrote:
> I'm not sure I get what you're saying here. You seem to be saying "It
> doesn't matter whether one is doing one day of reviewing each month, or
> two hundred mini-reviews of one minute each in an iteration - it's just
> the same amount of review."
That's why I said, "The Tao which can be talked about is not the eternal
Tao".
"Tao" means the "way". So, in context, the path of code's growth that can be
talked about in a static review is not the same as pairing to grow the code.
Talking about the code has fewer dimensions.
I look forward to pairing with H.S. Lahman.
--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
.
- References:
- XP and Pair Programming
- From: Ashima
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: christian9997
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Christopher Barber
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by Date: Re: Some questions about inheritance
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|