Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit <laurent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:37:25 +0200
Lurker,
> Note btw that I said they must be serialisable. If they aren't,
> then my argument won't hold but then neither will your
> testing argument hold.
I think you should clarify and expand the above.
Laurent
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Lurker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- References:
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Robert C . Martin
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Lurker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Phlip
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Andrew McDonagh
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- From: Lurker
- Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by Date: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Next by thread: Re: XP and Pair Programming
- Index(es):