comp.object

Thread Index

Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: EventHelix.com
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: query_me2001
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: raf
Re: Persistence management patterns
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Mike G
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: EventHelix.com
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Persistence management patterns
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: UML and its implemented code
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Major Kong
UML and its implemented code
- From: query_me2001
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Patrick May
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: most appropriate design pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Persistence management patterns
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: most appropriate design pattern
- From: nlbauers
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: most appropriate design pattern
- From: iamfractal
Re: most appropriate design pattern
- From: EventHelix.com
Re: most appropriate design pattern
- From: Patrick May
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Patrick May
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Mike G
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Peng Yu
Re: How to I access a logging class from any other class.
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Robert C . Martin
most appropriate design pattern
- From: nlbauers
Re: How to I access a logging class from any other class.
- From: ssg31415926
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: How to I access a logging class from any other class.
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: How to I access a logging class from any other class.
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Doc O'Leary
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Ilja Preuß
How to I access a logging class from any other class.
- From: ssg31415926
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Adrian Hey
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Peng Yu
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: laurent . ct
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Art
Re: Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: show text file access in UML
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Art
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Art
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Doc O'Leary
Strategy and visitor Design Pattern
- From: Peng Yu
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Patrick May
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Re: Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Class design: variable business rules help!
- From: Art
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Zorro
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
show text file access in UML
- From: Rizwan
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: CodeFutures
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Phlip
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: IndianCars
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Phlip
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: tony
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Wavemaker
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: topmind
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Design advice needed
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Bjorn Reese
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Patrick May
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: 3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Daniel Parker
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: Understanding OO Code
- From: EventHelix.com
Understanding OO Code
- From: tony
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
3GL vs. 4GL [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Message-based vs. method-based interaction [was: Re: LSP and subtype]
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: Patrick May
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Patrick May
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: Guy
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Roger L. Cauvin
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Patrick May
Design advice needed
- From: lothar . behrens
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Phlip
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Do It Yourself
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Patrick May
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: How to express C++ template in UML
- From: Phlip
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: Bruno Desthuilliers
How to express C++ template in UML
- From: Peng Yu
Do It Yourself
- From: tester384@xxxxxxxxx
Re: DrawCLI example vs MVC
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: argument contravariance
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: DrawCLI example vs MVC
- From: Phlip
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Patrick May
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Major Kong
DrawCLI example vs MVC
- From: Timerwai
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Charles Krug
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Patrick May
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: Data Access Objects?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: table oriented programming
- From: jazzcat
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Patrick May
Java to C and alternatives to Object monitors
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: table oriented programming
- From: topmind
Data Access Objects?
- From: rincewind
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: Andreas Huber
Re: What is the point in using argument contravariance
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
table oriented programming
- From: Mikito Harakiri
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: how to draw nested type in UML?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: LSP and subtype
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
What is the point in using argument contravariance
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: result covariance
- From: Christopher Barber
Re: argument contravariance
- From: Marc Rohloff
Re: Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Patrick May
Effecting run time change in behavior
- From: Kallol Borah
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: argument contravariance
- From: Robert C . Martin
how to draw nested type in UML?
- From: Peng Yu
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: adaworks
Re: <UML> Activations in Sequence Diagram
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
LSP and subtype
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: scottf3095
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: scottf3095
Re: <UML> Relationships for data members and function arguments
- From: Alex Vinokur
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: <UML> Activations in Sequence Diagram
- From: Mark Woyna
Re: <UML> Relationships for data members and function arguments
- From: Mark Woyna
Re: <UML> Activations in Sequence Diagram
- From: Alex Vinokur
Re: <UML> "uses" and "requires" stereotypes/relationships
- From: Mark Woyna
Re: <UML> Activations in Sequence Diagram
- From: Mark Woyna
<UML> Relationships for data members and function arguments
- From: Alex Vinokur
<UML> "uses" and "requires" stereotypes/relationships
- From: Alex Vinokur
argument contravariance
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: result covariance
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
<UML> Activations in Sequence Diagram
- From: Alex Vinokur
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Phlip
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: raf
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: Doc O'Leary
result covariance
- From: Tony Johansson
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: scottf3095
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: scottf3095
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Phlip
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: EventHelix.com
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: AndyW
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: Mike Austin
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: nooogle
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Phlip
Re: Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: yaoziyuan
Introducing the concept "state" to object-oriented programming
- From: yaoziyuan
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: raf
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: scottf3095
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: newbie object design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: newbie object design question
- From: ChrisB
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Cristiano Sadun
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Phlip
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: frebe
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Major Kong
Re: Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Good Guidelines and examples of Good Stakeholder Requests and Product Features
- From: Major Kong
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Phlip
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: AndyW
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: AndyW
Re: Adaptive and object-oriented approaches
- From: Henk Verhoeven
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: should developers write technical requirements?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Design advice needed
- From: Stefan Seefeld
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Mark Woyna
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: raf
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: topmind
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: JXStern
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Phlip
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: raf
Re: Data driven people arguments
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Data driven people arguments
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Re: Design advice needed
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Design advice needed
- From: elvis_the_king
Re: TDD and the development time
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
TDD and the development time
- From: tercio@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Composite Design Pattern
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: newbie object design question
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Michael Schneider
Composite Design Pattern
- From: Merlin
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Andrew McDonagh
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Not able to open objectime tool on linux
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: newbie object design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Goran Sliskovic
Re: Is programming/computer science an art or science? or both?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Ilja Preuß
Re: Should you write use cases without actors?
- From: Major Kong
Re: newbie object design question
- From: ChrisB
Re: Design advice needed
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Should you write use cases without actors?
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: newbie object design question
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Shezan Baig
Testing forces protected methods?
- From: Francesco Vivoli
Not able to open objectime tool on linux
- From: hirendra_a
Re: [UML] Full lines between Use Cases
- From: Juergen Wuest
newbie object design question
- From: ChrisB
Re: Should you write use cases without actors?
- From: H. S. Lahman
Should you write use cases without actors?
- From: Major Kong
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: rafaeldff
Re: Design advice needed
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: iamfractal
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Robert C . Martin
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Michael Schneider
[UML] Full lines between Use Cases
- From: Alex Vinokur
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Carmine Moleti
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Duncan A. McRae
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: Mike Austin
Re: Design advice needed
- From: elvis_the_king
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Brendan Guild
Re: Design advice needed
- From: H. S. Lahman
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Carmine Moleti
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Carmine Moleti
Re: OOP Deseign for a chat room
- From: LeeMorris
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Laurent Bossavit
Re: Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Michael Schneider
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: raxitsheth
Improving my OOA/OOD abilities
- From: Carmine Moleti
Re: Double Dispatch ?
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Double Dispatch ?
- From: raxitsheth
Re: OOP Deseign for a chat room
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
Re: OOP Deseign for a chat room
- From: Phlip
OOP Deseign for a chat room
- From: mercuryguy
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: Why encapsulate state pattern......
- From: Mark Nicholls
Re: UML modeler reviews
- From: Marco
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
library for querying virtual polygon over raster spatial data
- From: paul
Re: Question Unified Process
- From: Steven Woody