Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- From: "H. S. Lahman" <h.lahman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:03:25 GMT
Responding to Bossavit...
Now that 4GLs are becoming available for general programming, the 3GLs will bite the dust as well -- simply because the 4GLs allow the developer to focus creativity better.
That brings to mind the saying that trees don't grow to the sky. What constraints apply to the process you describe ?
Alas, I'm not sure what you are asking here.
My gut response is that the main distinction between 4GLs and 3GLs is that they are independent of particular computing space implementations (RDBs, TCP/IP, .NET, EJB, etc.) and express the solution purely in problem space terms. (Obviously if one is building a DBMS engine, then the problem space /is/ the computing space.) So the major constraint would be to avoid implementation pollution (i.e., letting particular platform strategies creep into the 4GL solution).
************* There is nothing wrong with me that could not be cured by a capful of Drano.
H. S. Lahman hsl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work http://www.pathfindermda.com blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman (888)OOA-PATH
.
- References:
- Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- From: Francesco Vivoli
- Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- From: Laurent Bossavit
- Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- Prev by Date: Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- Next by Date: Re: The intelligent agent philosophy of thinking
- Previous by thread: Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- Next by thread: Re: Technologies and frameworks are killing creativity?
- Index(es):