Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Phlip <phlip2005@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:36:53 GMT
Daniel Parker wrote:
Interesting. Do you think the designers of Java were lazy by
introducing the concept of a default DateFormat singleton object
accessible by a DateFormat.getInstance() member? Do you have a better
idea?
Singletons are awesome, and unit tests suck, Daniel.
And don't get me started about Java.
--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- References:
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Phlip
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Index(es):