Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: "Daniel Parker" <danielaparker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Feb 2006 13:39:17 -0800
Phlip wrote:
Daniel Parker wrote:So you don't have a better idea :-(
Interesting. Do you think the designers of Java were lazy by
introducing the concept of a default DateFormat singleton object
accessible by a DateFormat.getInstance() member? Do you have a better
idea?
Singletons are awesome, and unit tests suck, Daniel.
And don't get me started about Java.
Regards,
Daniel Parker
http://servingxml.sourceforge.net/
.
- References:
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Phlip
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: Phlip
- Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Index(es):