Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- From: "Daniel T." <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:04:51 GMT
In article <FzLLf.1426$IQ2.183@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Phlip <phlip2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No globals exist besides my few singletons :)
To achieve the moral high-ground here, you might admit that most modules do
not write on your Singletons (do not set their Set() methods). Global
constants are harmless, therefor global defacto-constants inside Singletons
are mostly harmless.
In C++, cout is a global and I write to it all the time. Unless you are
saying that cout is "bad design" I can't agree with your assessment
above. ;-)
--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by Date: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Next by thread: Re: Can use of singletons denote poor project design?
- Index(es):