Re: software architecture/design question
- From: "Ragu" <ragunathan.pattabiraman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Feb 2006 08:21:08 -0800
Thanks Lahman, for quick response clarifying some of the implications
of the application of the mediator. But not sure whether I understood
everything you have told here. I shall study ur response further.
When deciding on mediator pattern here, I speculated that (1) the
sequence may be arbirary, decided at runtime, (2) the set of processors
(A..G) can vary. And I agree that there may need to be more complex
processing than just configuration, I am not much familiar with problem
domain either. (and thus possible bad speculations)
That got me thinking, its reasonably intuitive to visualize a pattern,
even for a newbie like me. And it would probably easier to refactor
available pattern to fit to solve the problem at hand. Is that
advisable approach?
Ragu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: software architecture/design question
- References:
- software architecture/design question
- From: ma740988
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: ma740988
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: Ragu
- Re: software architecture/design question
- From: H. S. Lahman
- software architecture/design question
- Prev by Date: Re: How to invert dependency?
- Next by Date: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Previous by thread: Re: software architecture/design question
- Next by thread: Re: software architecture/design question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|