Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:43:10 GMT, Daniel T. wrote:

In article <1140967633.852747.88410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Vysakh P Pillai" <vysakhpillai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is my 1st year B-tech Seminar topic.Can anyone plaese give me
someone please give me some points for this????

I'm redirecting this from comp.lang.c++. Anybody want to help out?

Passing messages tells nothing about what's going on. In terms of OSI it is
a transport layer, nobody cares about. OOP begins a pair storeys above, in
the application domain. IMO essential to OO is generic programming, i.e.
one in terms of sets of types. Hence polymorphism plays a crucial role for
OO.

--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Non-countability of R
    ... On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:45:16 EDT, daniel t wrote: ... A proof requires showing that ... Third Circuit ignores precedent in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cirrus and Pileus
    ... Duncan Merle: ... Daniel Stearns--composer ... The sun was trembling on the edge of the ridge ... like the seasons passing one by one ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
  • Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning
    ... On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Daniel J Blueman ... I don't know whether this is truly the Right Fix; ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: network trunkin
    ... On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, 23:35+1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: ... with VLANs. ... To unsubscribe, ...
    (freebsd-hackers)