Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: "Michael Redlich" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Feb 2006 18:24:07 -0800
Daniel Parker wrote:
Passing messages tells nothing about what's going on. In terms of OSI it
is
a transport layer, nobody cares about.
That seems clear enough. Everybody agree?
I believe that all of us can agree that OOP is much, much more than
"passing messages to objects." That's obviously how objects
communicate, and only one very small piece of the overall OOP "pie."
I also believe that all of us can agree that OOP is *not*
Procedure-Oriented Programming.
Mike.
-----
ACGNJ Java Users Group
http://www.javasig.org/
.
- References:
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: Daniel Parker
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Prev by Date: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Next by Date: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Next by thread: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Index(es):