Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: "Daniel T." <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:53:05 GMT
In article <postmaster-A45F76.15431226022006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Daniel T." <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1140967633.852747.88410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Vysakh P Pillai" <vysakhpillai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is my 1st year B-tech Seminar topic.Can anyone plaese give me
someone please give me some points for this????
I'm redirecting this from comp.lang.c++. Anybody want to help out?
To my mind, the best OO designs are all about little state machines
reacting to their environment (that environment being all the other
little state machines.)
--
Magic depends on tradition and belief. It does not welcome observation,
nor does it profit by experiment. On the other hand, science is based
on experience; it is open to correction by observation and experiment.
.
- References:
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Prev by Date: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Next by Date: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
- Next by thread: Time outs and state machines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|