comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Ulrich Frank
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Ulrich Frank
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: ma740988
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• implementation dilema
  • From: ma740988
• RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Slawomir J.
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Orientation in VB.NET
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Achim D. Brucker
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Ulrich Frank
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Ulrich Frank
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Juergen Wuest
• Re: Object Orientation in VB.NET
  • From: Persophen
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Orientation in VB.NET
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Achim D. Brucker
• Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: Ulrich Frank
• Final Call for Papers: IMECS 2006 (the multiconference of 14 engineering & computer science conferences)
  • From: imecs__2006
• [CfP] 3rd European Lisp Workshop - more news
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Object Orientation in VB.NET
  • From: andrew queisser
• Entry Level Software Engineer/Linguist Positions in Text-to-Speech Synthesis
  • From: nish . chandra
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: John D Salt
• Object Orientation in VB.NET
  • From: Persophen
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: Hinnerk Feldwisch
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: craig
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: craig
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: S Perryman
• UML class diagrams: hiding the attribute list
  • From: Hinnerk Feldwisch
• QA Lead position.
  • From: vani
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: craig
• Re: WEBI WINOTIFY.EXE PROBLEM
  • From: Bruno Desthuilliers
• WEBI WINOTIFY.EXE PROBLEM
  • From: maria
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Tools for drawing simple object/pattern diagrams?
  • From: craig
• Re: UML-ish question
  • From: Alec Ross
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Re: Use cases and visualization information
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Why no one operating system is wrtten in an object language...!!!
  • From: Joris REHM
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Use cases and visualization information
  • From: Antonio Santiago
• Are you a Rockstar in Java Programming ?
  • From: vinitha28
• ANN: OOP Blog
  • From: simonkatich90@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sequence Diagrams in XMI v1.2
  • From: EventHelix.com
• Sequence Diagrams in XMI v1.2
  • From: Thomas Hermansen
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: PAC (presentation-abstraction-control) question
  • From: craig
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: PAC (presentation-abstraction-control) question
  • From: Phlip
• Re: PAC (presentation-abstraction-control) question
  • From: craig
• Re: UML-ish question
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: jladd
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: UML-ish question
  • From: Bart Wakker
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: andrew queisser
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: UML-ish question
  • From: Alan Chen
• Re: Kinds of methods
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: UML-ish question
  • From: Oliver Wong
• UML-ish question
  • From: jhinchey@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Kinds of methods
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• "Estimation with Use Cases: A Simple and Effective Approach to Estimating Software Projects" by Jon Porter.
  • From: MtnTopRebel
• Use Case and Tasks or Activities
  • From: Luca
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: need help in Corba java(servant manager activator class)
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• need help in Corba java(servant manager activator class)
  • From: ashwinibhingare
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Where lives MapperRegistry?
  • From: CH
• Free JAVA Resources- javabooklinks.co.nr
  • From: kingjnew
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Estimation with Use Cases
  • From: MtnTopRebel
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Piotr Sawuk
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How can you make 2 existing classes into "observers"?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: How can you make 2 existing classes into "observers"?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• How can you make 2 existing classes into "observers"?
  • From: craig
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Don Roby
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Role Based Security and logical AND
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Phlip
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Role Based Security and logical AND
  • From: chuck
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Alien design paradigm to alleviate "software crisis"
  • From: e . t . alien1
• Re: Role Based Security and logical AND
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• ANN: Free Ezine - Articles: Ruby Rails AspectJ Ajax
  • From: Mark Collins-Cope
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: AndyW
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Role Based Security and logical AND
  • From: chuck
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• CfP: OMG's Real-time and Embedded Systems Workshop 2006
  • From: dana
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Agreement <-> transaction, responsibility
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Agreement <-> transaction, responsibility
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Agreement <-> transaction, responsibility
  • From: John Andersen
• Re: Agreement <-> transaction, responsibility
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: S Perryman
• Agreement <-> transaction, responsibility
  • From: John Andersen
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Randy A. Ynchausti
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Dex
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: Design Diagram suitable for installation/upgrade/patches.
  • From: Shekar
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Phlip
• Re: optimization
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Message Builder vs. a Build Method?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Design by contract and unit tests
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Design Diagram suitable for installation/upgrade/patches.
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: With Agile methods, we are measuring the right things
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• optimization
  • From: chrismgp
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: Design by contract and unit tests
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Design by contract and unit tests
  • From: Robert C . Martin
• Re: Message Builder vs. a Build Method?
  • From: SP
• Re: Message Builder vs. a Build Method?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Message Builder vs. a Build Method?
  • From: kk_oop
• Design Diagram suitable for installation/upgrade/patches.
  • From: Shekar
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: nelson
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• UML, Business Processes and Magicdraw
  • From: Luca
• multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: kk_oop
• Re: where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: Paul Herber
• Re: where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: wangcity
• Re: where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• where is the group for uml in usenet? and where can get free uml2.0 ebook?
  • From: wangcity
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ey
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Piotr Sawuk
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Call for Papers with extended deadline: IMECS 2006 (the multiconference of 14 engineering & computer science conferences)
  • From: imecs__2006
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: Does anyone know of places/venues to present a software reuse/SOA seminar?
  • From: JXStern
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: adaworks
• Does anyone know of places/venues to present a software reuse/SOA seminar?
  • From: Don Huey
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Re: Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Phlip
• Object Model feedback requested
  • From: Ismael Jones
• Call for Papers: IMECS 2006 (the multiconference of 14 engineering & computer science conferences)
  • From: imecs__2006
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Class Model - An interesting one...
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Piotr Sawuk
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Piotr Sawuk
• Re: system interface transactions
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: adaworks
• Re: Dose OOP Model the real world?
  • From: adaworks
• Entity Life History / Jackson Structure
  • From: n
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: topmind
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: difference between component and class?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• CFP: IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE WWW/INTERNET 2006
  • From: natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Class Model - An interesting one...
  • From: prateekbaxi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Phlip
• system interface transactions
  • From: timasmith
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: difference between component and class?
  • From: Phlip
• difference between component and class?
  • From: Jordan Taylor
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Call for Papers: IAENG International Workshop on Software Engineering (in IMECS 2006)
  • From: imecs_2006
• Re: Alien design paradigm to alleviate "software crisis"
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Class Model - An interesting one...
  • From: Patrick May
• Re: Time outs and state machines
  • From: Leslie Sanford
• Re: Alien design paradigm to alleviate ?software crisis?
  • From: Berislav Lopac
• Alien design paradigm to alleviate ?software crisis?
  • From: e_t_alien
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Daniel T.
• Class Model - An interesting one...
  • From: prateekbaxi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Phlip
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Miguel Oliveira e Silva
• Re: OOP can be simply summed up as 'passing messages to objects'
  • From: Thomas Gagne
• Re: Maintance of c++ code
  • From: Piotr Sawuk
• Re: Time outs and state machines
  • From: Robert Oliver

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)