comp.object

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Thinking in OO
  • From: Bernard Notarianni
• Re: Alien design paradigm to alleviate "software crisis"
  • From: Adie
• Re: Interface to a file?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Sasa
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Organizing commands and UI matters
  • From: bart_deboeck@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on LSP [LONG]
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP [LONG]
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Managing multiple instances
  • From: Daniel T.
• Managing multiple instances
  • From: Benjamin M. Stocks
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Set Theory and OO
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Set Theory and OO (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Set Theory and OO
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: John D Salt
• Re: Interface to a file?
  • From: JMF
• Re: Set Theory and OO
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Set Theory and OO (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Set Theory and OO
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Set Theory and OO (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Set Theory and OO
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Where's Universe?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Set Theory and OO (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Modelling an OO data structure
  • From: Phlip
• Where's Universe?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Interface to a file?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Organizing commands and UI matters
  • From: tailorma_de
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Class design question
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Class design question
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• CoderWiki.com - A free online reference manual
  • From: da404LewZer
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Interface to a file?
  • From: JMF
• Re: Class design question
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• how to represent multiobject in Rational Software Architect
  • From: Marco Cardelli
• Class design question
  • From: sundeep
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: viveklinux
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: daniel_t
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: vivekaseeja
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: vivekaseeja
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: vivekaseeja
• OMG's Real-time and Embedded Workshop, July 10-13, 2006, Arlington, VA
  • From: dana
• Re: abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: Phlip
• abstract factory -- a doubt ?
  • From: viveklinux
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: karl . wettin
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: Phlip
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: karl . wettin
• Diamond Crush: Are you ready to crush?
  • From: cover
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: karl . wettin
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Sign up for a free StickyMinds.com Membership today
  • From: loulou384
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Thinking in OO
  • From: Laurent Bossavit
• Re: Performanz of CORBA
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Thinking in OO
  • From: Daniel T.
• Performanz of CORBA
  • From: maxpower24
• Re: Thinking in OO
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Daniel T.
• native arrays in class diagrams
  • From: karl . wettin
• Re: Bridge Pattern
  • From: ng5000
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Thinking in OO
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Thinking in OO
  • From: Gregory Coit
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Bridge Pattern
  • From: Alvin Ryder
• Re: Bridge Pattern
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Bridge Pattern
  • From: ng5000
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Q: Solutions for requirements tracing (to design, code, and test items)
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: UML inner/nested class associations
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: Daniel Parker
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: Daniel T.
• Q: Solutions for requirements tracing (to design, code, and test items)
  • From: Ivan Vecerina
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Mark Nicholls
• Re: Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: UML Structured class with utility parts?
  • From: JMF
• Proper state behavior? (was: Question on LSP)
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: UML inner/nested class associations
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: UML inner/nested class associations
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: UML Structured class with utility parts?
  • From: Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Re: UML Structured class with utility parts?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Question on Effective Java Item 27
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• UML inner/nested class associations
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: DbC postconditions and the correctness of contracts
  • From: Roger Browne
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Sasa
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• UML Structured class with utility parts?
  • From: JMF
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: sizeof in java
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• sizeof in java
  • From: Kulbir Singh
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: cohesive packages
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: AndyW
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: cohesive packages
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: is uml appropriate for this ...
  • From: sweet_dreams
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: bernard.notarianni@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: I. Munoz
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Phlip
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Cody Powell
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Ron Jeffries
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: ggroups
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• inappropriate upfront?
  • From: Sasa
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Bjorn Reese
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Adie
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: need your help!
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: is uml appropriate for this ...
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: New to UML
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: need your help!
  • From: I. Munoz
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: I. Munoz
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: I. Munoz
• Re: need your help!
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: need your help!
  • From: raf
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: kevin cline
• Re: New to UML
  • From: raf
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Adie
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: kevin cline
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: need your help!
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: S Perryman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: kevin cline
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Daniel T.
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: kevin cline
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Phlip
• Re: Question on LSP
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Question on LSP
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: need your help!
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: cohesive packages
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: network design
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: network design
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• need your help!
  • From: Kulbir Singh
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Ilja Preuß
• Re: Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Question on Decorator pattern
  • From: hforco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• cohesive packages
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: network design
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: network design
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: New to UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: network design
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Noodle
• Re: network design
  • From: Ed Kirwan
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Daniel T.
• network design
  • From: VisionSet
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Sun Microsystems Announces Open Source Enterprise Development Tool Project
  • From: technology_post
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: what's mean????(RFID....)
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Noodle
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Noodle
• Re: What are ubiquitous and RF ID?????
  • From: Phlip
• What are ubiquitous and RF ID?????
  • From: KwangYun , Hwang
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: Penny Liang
• Re: Class that exposes a collection
  • From: SP
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: scott frye
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• Re: New to UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: New to UML
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Noodle
• Re: New to UML
  • From: Phlip
• New to UML
  • From: dean
• Re: Class that exposes a collection
  • From: tailorma_de
• Re: Do You Get What You Measure?
  • From: jasongorman
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: ralph
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: Andrew McDonagh
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: tailorma_de
• RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming (Shorter Version)
  • From: Slawomir J.
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: ralph
• Re: Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: I. Munoz
• Re: Class that exposes a collection
  • From: I. Munoz
• Calling same method in inherited classes
  • From: tailorma_de
• Class that exposes a collection
  • From: tailorma_de
• Re: association between class with a member enum type
  • From: SteveKlett
• Re: association between class with a member enum type
  • From: Marcin
• Re: is uml appropriate for this ...
  • From: EventHelix.com
• UML: association between class with a member enum type
  • From: SteveKlett
• Re: is uml appropriate for this ...
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• is uml appropriate for this ...
  • From: sweet_dreams
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• XML research
  • From: Zorro
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Slawomir J.
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Refactoring-Feature Article in Better Software Magazine
  • From: loulou384
• Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: multimethod + multiple inheritance
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: VS.NET Public Namespaces, classes, Function - Conceptual misunderstanding.
  • From: Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Re: VS.NET Public Namespaces, classes, Function - Conceptual misunderstanding.
  • From: SP
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Slawomir J.
• Re: RFC - New Object-Oriented Method of Parallel Programming
  • From: Slawomir J.
• VS.NET Public Namespaces, classes, Function - Conceptual misunderstanding.
  • From: jason
• Estimation with Use Cases: A Simple and Effective Approach
  • From: MtnTopRebel
• Estimation with Use Cases: A Simple and Effective Approach t
  • From: MtnTopRebel
• Estimation with Use Cases: A Simple and Effective Approach
  • From: MtnTopRebel
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: Object Constraint Language and Inheritance
  • From: H. S. Lahman
• Re: implementation dilema
  • From: ma740988

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)