Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: "S Perryman" <a@xxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:18:08 +0100
"H. S. Lahman" <h.lahman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:peCig.1477$oE3.267@xxxxxxxxxxx
I want some demonstration of why the OOA/D that MDA-based translationists
practice is not the OOA/D that "most people" practice. (Aside from the
obvious use of translation automation for OOD/P.) We could start a quote
war by pulling quotes out of various OOA/D authors' books but that is
subject to interpretation, context, and other factors. Fortunately there
is a more objective way to resolve the dispute.
If there is some fundamental difference between the MDA/translation view
and "most people's", then that difference should be manifested in the OOA
models we produce. That is, for some problem the model that we would
produce would /always/ be different from the model that "most people"
would produce and that difference would be directly traceable to some
fundamental difference in design approaches.
Lets' start with something quite simple. The CS101 stack (LIFO) .
Define the stack with all its properties (push, top etc) using "translation
OOA" .
Regards,
Steven Perryman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- References:
- Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Let's put this to rest
- Prev by Date: Re: identity...... Was: The wisdom of the object mentors
- Next by Date: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Previous by thread: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Next by thread: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
