Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: "S Perryman" <a@xxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:30:15 +0100
"H. S. Lahman" <h.lahman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DCVjg.15224$OQ2.708@xxxxxxxxxxx
Responding to Perryman...
That is all there is to it. Do what you must in order to define the above
using "translation OOA" ...
You are asking for an OOP class definition, not an OOA model. Stick to
the original challenge and find an example in either book that you can
demonstrate would be done differently by "most people" because of some
fundamental difference in design methodology.
1. Already done. In a few seconds. No problem whatsoever.
So what I have is an OOA model for a stack.
Free of implementation info. Implementable in any way a developer sees fit.
2. I have chosen a trivial, well-known example.
But an example that IMHO will be done differently by people who use a
fundamentally different method.
Once we have gone beyond the trivial, I have what IMHO is a more
stimulating book example to play with.
But until then, my stack OOA model is ready and waiting. When yours is
ready,
inform me and we can post to comp.object to compare/contrast.
Regards,
Steven Perryman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: AndyW
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: Davor
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- References:
- Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: S Perryman
- Re: Let's put this to rest
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Let's put this to rest
- Prev by Date: Re: OO and RDB war : in the advent of MRAM
- Next by Date: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Previous by thread: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Next by thread: Re: Let's put this to rest
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|