Re: Is this correct?!!!

Hi

Thanks again.
So, you mean it is a one-to-many association?

Regards
Mojtaba


H. S. Lahman wrote:

Responding to Mojtaba_danai...

Hi

Thanks for the answer. But, how will you define my example in UML?

1 *
[Bar] ----------------- [Foo]

As I indicated, I don't use dependencies in UML. B-)

*************
There is nothing wrong with me that could
not be cured by a capful of Drano.

H. S. Lahman
hsl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work
http://www.pathfindermda.com
blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman
Pathfinder is hiring:
http://www.pathfindermda.com/about_us/careers_pos3.php.
(888)OOA-PATH

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: UML question
    ... H. S. Lahman wrote: ... > represent it in UML. ... correct conceptual entity/relationship diagram. ... extension to UML class diagram syntax is under discussion. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models
    ... I suggest that you read the posts from HS Lahman in this thread. ... It is that tailoring of relationship participation at the object level rather than the class level that eliminates the searches. ... Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: verfication, validation and test in object world
    ... H. S. Lahman ... Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work ... blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Is this correct?!!!
    ... Responding to Mojtaba_danai... ... I don't use dependencies in UML. ... Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work ...
    (comp.object)