Re: Is this correct?!!!
- From: "H. S. Lahman" <h.lahman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:23:40 GMT
Responding to Mojtaba_danai...
Hi
Thanks again.
So, you mean it is a one-to-many association?
Yes. You had two Foos in your example; one embedded ('foo') and one created as a reference ('foo1'). The multiplicity on the [Foo] side of the relationship indicates how many distinct objects of the [Foo] set a single [Bar] object may be related to.
[Technically the 1 on the [Bar] side is my guess. Without knowing what went on inside "// ..." I can't say for certain whether other <temporary> relationships might have been instantiated between 'foo1' and other objects than Bar.]
*************
There is nothing wrong with me that could
not be cured by a capful of Drano.
H. S. Lahman
hsl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pathfinder Solutions -- Put MDA to Work
http://www.pathfindermda.com
blog: http://pathfinderpeople.blogs.com/hslahman
Pathfinder is hiring: http://www.pathfindermda.com/about_us/careers_pos3.php.
(888)OOA-PATH
.
- References:
- Is this correct?!!!
- From: mojtaba_danai@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is this correct?!!!
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Is this correct?!!!
- From: mojtaba_danai@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is this correct?!!!
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Is this correct?!!!
- From: mojtaba_danai@xxxxxxxxx
- Is this correct?!!!
- Prev by Date: Re: Object identity
- Next by Date: Re: Object identity
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this correct?!!!
- Next by thread: Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|