(OT) Re: Object identity
- From: "Gabriel Claramunt" <gabclar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:42:05 GMT
Just a small off-topic comment:
I don't remember any way to make the square root of a negative number a real
number...
:-D
Note that your sentence betrays an aversion to wanting to treat numbers....
as real in any sense whatsoever. You use words like "concept",
"notion", "abstracted". I suppose you say most numbers don't exist
because no one has written them down. I on the other hand am a
Platonist and don't lose any sleep over this, or force myself to
pollute my sentences with lots of additional but meaningless words to
indicate that numbers aren't real.
I consider that we are doing computer science here, and it is
ultimately a branch of (applied) mathematics. Your aversion to
treating numbers as real strikes me as a sure indicator that you are
lacing your arguments with metaphysical viewpoints that are outside the
scope of computer science.
Cheers,
David Barrett-Lennard.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (OT) Re: Object identity
- From: Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: (OT) Re: Object identity
- References:
- Object identity
- From: David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Object identity
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Object identity
- From: David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Object identity
- From: H. S. Lahman
- Re: Object identity
- From: David Barrett-Lennard
- Object identity
- Prev by Date: Create special-shaped windows
- Next by Date: Re: (OT) Re: Object identity
- Previous by thread: Re: Object identity
- Next by thread: Re: (OT) Re: Object identity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|