Re: (OT) Re: Object identity

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:42:05 GMT, Gabriel Claramunt wrote:

Just a small off-topic comment:
I don't remember any way to make the square root of a negative number a real
number...

Note that your sentence betrays an aversion to wanting to treat numbers
as real in any sense whatsoever. You use words like "concept",
"notion", "abstracted". I suppose you say most numbers don't exist
because no one has written them down. I on the other hand am a
Platonist and don't lose any sleep over this, or force myself to
pollute my sentences with lots of additional but meaningless words to
indicate that numbers aren't real.

I consider that we are doing computer science here, and it is
ultimately a branch of (applied) mathematics. Your aversion to
treating numbers as real strikes me as a sure indicator that you are
lacing your arguments with metaphysical viewpoints that are outside the
scope of computer science.

Read Plato dialogs: you can't make it, you must remember it! (:-))

Plato is also silent about what happens with all things nobody can remember
of, and whether wrong things are real. Can anybody be *really* wrong? (:-))

--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.