Re: Persistence
- From: "Daniel T." <daniel_t@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:28:57 GMT
In article <1152797147.674642.106880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
frebe73@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The relational model was designed to work with any Turing complete
language, I don't see why an OOL can't be used.
Of course an OOPL can and should access a SQL database.
Excuse me? That sounds like a dangerous one size fits all mentality.
Maybe you should clarify.
Excuse me. I have no idea what you are talking about. Maybe you should
clarify.
You make it sound like any and all OO programs should access one or more
SQL databases. Is that what you meant, or did I misunderstand?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Persistence
- From: frebe73
- Re: Persistence
- References:
- Persistence
- From: frebe73
- Re: Persistence
- From: Alvin Ryder
- Re: Persistence
- From: frebe73
- Re: Persistence
- From: Alvin Ryder
- Re: Persistence
- From: frebe73
- Re: Persistence
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Persistence
- From: frebe73
- Persistence
- Prev by Date: Re: Observer pattern limitations
- Next by Date: Re: Design problem with inheritance
- Previous by thread: Re: Persistence
- Next by thread: Re: Persistence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|