Re: Persistence

frebe73@xxxxxxxxx a écrit :
(snip)

If you don't need anything but persistence, persisting objects directly
would make sense. But mostly you really need the other features
provided by a RDBMS.

I don't get you here... Do you mean that every OO program absolutely
needs a SQL DBMS ?


Absolutely not, did you notice the word "mostly"?

Well, err... no. But now that you talk about it...

There are also many
programs that don't need persistence, and there are programs that need
other kind of persistence than a SQL DBMS can offer.

Indeed

Fredrik Bertilsson
http://frebe.php0h.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SQL
    ... My point is that these features are useful non-persistence features ... "If we ignore the persistence aspect, ... I don't claim that a RDBMS is the only product that may ... > Do you have any examples of relational databases that have specific features ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Relational database & OO
    ... data to a persistence storage medium. ... using the features already provided by the RDBMS, ... Caching is the second issue. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Why cant recursive queries contain...?
    ... optimizer would require huge investments of time, ... your SQL DBMS. ... all of the latest and greatest features that these backwards-compatibility ... backwards compatibility, I just think that after a certain point in time it ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
  • Re: Persistence
    ... relevant to the business context of a particular application. ... Are you here only for bashing, or are seriously interested in OO? ... other kind of persistence than a SQL DBMS can offer. ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Any difference between SQL-DBMS & RDBMS ?
    ... An RDBMS is a system implementing ALL of RM concepts. ... A SQL DBMS implements few RM concepts and mostly randomly chosen and ... own mind ... oract wrote: ...
    (comp.databases.theory)