Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- From: Rick Elbers <rick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:36:54 +0200
Philip,
Am I excused when I dont understand what in heavens name you talk
about?
Rick
Op Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:15:30 GMT schreef "Phlip" <phlipcpp@xxxxxxxxx>:
"Rick Elbers" <rick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kpf8g2dad2nrrncp52ls8c97ot43vpc4kp@xxxxxxxxxx
Dear W,
I think you are absolutely right. While every application model could
be described in object terms, a lot of them dont need it. Quite a lot
of money is invested an earned in essentially CREDO applications
(CRUD + Overview). Those applications might as well be constructed
using a good two-tier framework. If we, for instance, look at what
objects do in most applicatons using NHibernate or another ORMapper
you would be very willing to consider those "empty" objects more like
the "cost" of development then having anything to do with what OO
promisses us.
That is an example why OO is not a "description" process.
It's a system to make direct calls into indirect calls. That technique is
useful in all situations where excess coupling should be replaced by
extensibility.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- From: VV
- Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- From: Rick Elbers
- Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- From: Phlip
- what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- Prev by Date: Re: Abstract public member variales?
- Next by Date: Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- Previous by thread: Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- Next by thread: Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
