Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: "Daniel T." <daniel_t@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:30:09 GMT
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Daniel T. wrote:
Funny, you are always going on about how in your domain, OO doesn't
work. Here you are bashing my practices while having no clue what
domain I work in. [....]
Doesn't it apply both ways? Nobody knows everything nor every domain.
You tell me, it's your rule. The OP asked about a specific OO issue and
you jumped in without any knowledge of his domain and started harping
about "OO isn't good!"
If you want to bash OO, by all means start a thread and do it. Don't try
to trash other threads.
--
There are two things that simply cannot be doubted, logic and perception.
Doubt those, and you no longer have anyone to discuss your doubts with,
nor any ability to discuss them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- References:
- Is this too much OOP?
- From: needin4mation
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Is this too much OOP?
- Prev by Date: Re: Abstract public member variales?
- Next by Date: Re: Is this too much OOP?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this too much OOP?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this too much OOP?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
