Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Sep 2006 21:04:50 -0700
Daniel T. wrote:
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Daniel T. wrote:
"topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Daniel T. wrote:
If you want to bash OO, by all means start a thread and do it.
Don't try to trash other threads.
I am just giving counter points. One-sided point of views are the
type one gets in Iran.
At least I am criticising only ideas, not people. Thus, one could do
a lot worse.
What you didn't do though, is make any attempt to answer the OPs
question. There wasn't anything to criticize, there was simply a
question to answer. Criticizing people's behavior is appropriate when
the behavior is destructive to social intercourse.
This all started when I simply offered some alternative opinions on
case statements and OO's alleged betterment. I didn't create the
original opinions, you did. I simply gave counterpoints to them. How
that makes me bad, I don't know.
-T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- References:
- Is this too much OOP?
- From: needin4mation
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: topmind
- Re: Is this too much OOP?
- From: Daniel T.
- Is this too much OOP?
- Prev by Date: Re: Singleton vs. Static
- Next by Date: Re: Abstract public member variales?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is this too much OOP?
- Next by thread: Re: Is this too much OOP?
- Index(es):