comp.object

• Date Index

---

• SOA and its real state of the art, Luca
  • Re: SOA and its real state of the art, AndyW
    • Re: SOA and its real state of the art, Luca
      • Re: SOA and its real state of the art, AndyW
      • Re: SOA and its real state of the art, Francesc
• Business objects planning opportunity in the UK, m . skinner
• Re: Applying multiple design paterns to a single class, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Applying multiple design paterns to a single class, raxitsheth2000
• A Simple jTextPane Problem, mm
• UML certification: hands on study?, biztalk . architect
• Archetypes vs Stereotypes, John Carter
  • Re: Archetypes vs Stereotypes, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
  • Re: Archetypes vs Stereotypes, Doug Pardee
    • Re: Archetypes vs Stereotypes, Rebecca Wirfs-Brock
• Singleton vs. Static, moop?
  • Re: Singleton vs. Static, H. S. Lahman
• Advice on finding more material, kognition@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Advice on finding more material, jukkaT
• OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Shawn
  • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Guruk
  • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Phlip
    • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, topmind
      • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, topmind
      • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Mike Austin
  • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Daniel T.
    • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: OO is not that great: many repeated codes, Bruno Desthuilliers
• help me., Leon Wu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • help me., Leon Wu
  • help me., Leon Wu
    • Re: help me., H. S. Lahman
      • Re: help me., Leon Wu
      • Re: help me., H. S. Lahman
• Internal State vs. Navigating Associations, Matt McGill
  • Re: Internal State vs. Navigating Associations, Guruk
  • Re: Internal State vs. Navigating Associations, Daniel T.
  • Re: Internal State vs. Navigating Associations, Rick Elbers
  • Re: Internal State vs. Navigating Associations, H. S. Lahman
• Is this too much OOP?, needin4mation
  • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Damian 'legion' Szuberski
  • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
    • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
  • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
    • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, topmind
  • Re: Is this too much OOP?, raxitsheth2000
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this too much OOP?, needin4mation
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, needin4mation
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, needin4mation
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Rick Elbers
    • Re: Is this too much OOP?, needin4mation
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, JXStern
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Daniel T.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is this too much OOP?, Bruno Desthuilliers
• UML Association?, Guruk
  • Re: UML Association?, Daniel T.
  • Re: UML Association?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: UML Association?, Guruk
      • Re: UML Association?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: UML Association?, Guruk
• execution speeds, Steve Hawkwind
• Re: Stop Cross-posting please (SETI vs. DNA-ID), topmind
• a modular design issue, Shawn
  • Re: a modular design issue, Oliver Wong
  • Re: a modular design issue, Doc O'Leary
  • Re: a modular design issue, Rick Elbers
  • Re: a modular design issue, Daniel T.
  • Re: a modular design issue, H. S. Lahman
• TDD, constant refactoring, good design, etc, Sasa
  • Re: TDD, constant refactoring, good design, etc, Phlip
    • Re: TDD, constant refactoring, good design, etc, Sasa
      • Re: TDD, constant refactoring, good design, etc, Phlip
  • Re: TDD, constant refactoring, good design, etc, S Perryman
• Re: function is not an object, Bruno Desthuilliers
• Anonymous Methods as Adapters, Leslie Sanford
  • Re: Anonymous Methods as Adapters, Sasa
• Data Layer Relationships, Guruk
  • Re: Data Layer Relationships, Rick Elbers
    • Re: Data Layer Relationships, Guruk
• Static vs Non static, Ravi Shankar Nair
  • Re: Static vs Non static, Rick Elbers
    • Re: Static vs Non static, Ravi Shankar Nair
  • Re: Static vs Non static, Squeamizh
  • Re: Static vs Non static, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID), Patrick May
  • Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID), Phlip
    • Re: scientific meathead (SETI vs. DNA-ID), Patrick May
• Identity Crime, topmind
• Group for MDA + SOA, Michael Gebhart
• Any good usergroup meetings in NYC?, Irving Fried
  • Re: Any good usergroup meetings in NYC?, panu@xxxxxxxxxx
• what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, VV
  • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, VV
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Oliver Wong
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, VV
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
  • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Greg Bittar
  • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
  • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, H. S. Lahman
    • Message not available
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
    • Message not available
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Barkster
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Trash ideas, not people, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Patrick May
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, topmind
    • Message not available
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, frebe73
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Bruno Desthuilliers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Polymorphism Downsides (was: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming), topmind
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, topmind
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides (was: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming), Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides (was: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming), topmind
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides (was: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming), vermeeca
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides (was: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming), topmind
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, Craig Vermeer
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, topmind
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, Craig Vermeer
      • Re: Polymorphism Downsides, topmind
  • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Rick Elbers
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Rick Elbers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Phlip
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Rick Elbers
    • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Rick Elbers
      • Re: what's the future of Object Oriented Programming, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• What books do you read / recommend, jwtulp
  • Re: What books do you read / recommend, Phlip
    • Re: What books do you read / recommend, aloha.kakuikanu
    • Re: What books do you read / recommend, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: What books do you read / recommend, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: What books do you read / recommend, Greg Bittar
  • Re: What books do you read / recommend, Nicholas
• Re: argouml sequence diagrams, eqv750218
  • Re: argouml sequence diagrams, codecowboy
• Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Luca
  • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Rick Elbers
    • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Ed
  • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Gabriel Claramunt
    • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Phlip
  • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Booch, Shlare/Mellor, Coad/Yourdon, Rumbaugh, Jacobson, Greg Bittar
• Regarding a design issue - in Java, Ravi Shankar Nair
  • Re: Regarding a design issue - in Java, raxitsheth2000
• Object Oriented - Interview questions, Luca
  • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, Phlip
    • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, Luca
  • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, Rick Elbers
  • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, topmind
    • Re: Object Oriented - Interview questions, Luca
• Deriving - .NET example, Sasa
  • Message not available
    • Re: Deriving - .NET example, Sasa
      • Message not available
      • Re: Deriving - .NET example, Sasa
      • Message not available
      • Re: Deriving - .NET example, Sasa
      • Message not available
      • Re: Deriving - .NET example, Sasa
  • Re: Deriving - .NET example, H. S. Lahman
• Abstract public member variables?, Brendan Guild
• Re: Not pure virtual functions and mixing virtual and non virtual methods, raxitsheth2000
• Re: yet another deriving question, raxitsheth2000
• Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
  • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Message not available
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Ed
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Adrian Hey
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Brendan Guild
      • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Daniel T.
    • Re: Abstract public member variales?, Rick Elbers
      • OT sig, Daniel T.
• oopsla's coming up!, Steve Metsker
• Iterations and business value delivered, Max
  • Re: Iterations and business value delivered, AndrewMcDonagh
  • Re: Iterations and business value delivered, Rick Elbers
  • Re: Iterations and business value delivered, Ron Jeffries
    • Re: Iterations and business value delivered, Rick Elbers
• Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, S Perryman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, Don Roby
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, adaworks
    • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, S Perryman
  • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, ulf
    • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, ulf
    • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, H. S. Lahman
    • Message not available
      • Re: delegation vs. inheritance, ulf
• Cross-platform installer package?, slippymississippi
• Cascading loads..., Guruk
  • Re: Cascading loads..., jwtulp
    • Re: Cascading loads..., Guruk
  • Re: Cascading loads..., H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Cascading loads..., Rick Elbers
• Re: Type substitutability [LONG] (Was: delegation vs. inheritance), S Perryman
  • Re: Type substitutability [LONG] (Was: delegation vs. inheritance), Mark Nicholls
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Type substitutability [LONG] (Was: delegation vs. inheritance), ulf
    • Re: Type substitutability [LONG] (Was: delegation vs. inheritance), Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: Circular Dependency?, Ed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Circular Dependency?, pranshu
    • Re: Circular Dependency?, Guruk
      • Re: Circular Dependency?, jwtulp
      • Re: Circular Dependency?, ShaneC
      • Re: Circular Dependency?, Rick Elbers
  • Re: Circular Dependency?, jwtulp
    • Re: Circular Dependency?, Guruk
      • Re: Circular Dependency?, jwtulp
  • Re: Circular Dependency?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Circular Dependency?, Rick Elbers
  • Re: Circular Dependency?, kevin cline
• Is boolean an object?, aloha.kakuikanu
  • Re: Is boolean an object?, Damian 'LegioN' Szuberski
  • Re: Is boolean an object?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: Is boolean an object?, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Rick Elbers
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Rick Elbers
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Rick Elbers
      • Re: Is boolean an object?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Is boolean an object?, Guruk
  • Re: Is boolean an object?, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is boolean an object?, Vadim Tropashko
    • Re: Is boolean an object?, Ricardo Birmann

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)