comp.object

• Date Index

---

• Pattern Question, russell
  • Re: Pattern Question, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Pattern Question, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    • Re: Pattern Question, Russ
• Half user config and half client prog implemented, visionset
  • Re: Half user config and half client prog implemented, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Half user config and half client prog implemented, visionset
      • Re: Half user config and half client prog implemented, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Half user config and half client prog implemented, topmind
• Delta, karl . wettin
  • Re: Delta, 000.tushar@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Delta, fikonskivor
  • Re: Delta, H. S. Lahman
• UML Command pattern and Sate Pattern, Bob
  • Re: UML Command pattern and Sate Pattern, Daniel T.
  • Re: UML Command pattern and Sate Pattern, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Format converter design pattern, ashraf . fouad
• Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, Matt McGill
  • Re: Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, karl . wettin
• Auto selection, tailorma_de
  • Re: Auto selection, Ed
    • Re: Auto selection, tailorma_de
      • Re: Auto selection, Ed
  • Re: Auto selection, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: Auto selection, tailorma_de
      • Re: Auto selection, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Auto selection, tailorma_de
      • Re: Auto selection, Laurent Bossavit
  • Re: Auto selection, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Auto selection, tailorma_de
      • Re: Auto selection, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Auto selection, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Auto selection, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Auto selection, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• How to describe array elements with UML2.0?, Allen
  • Re: How to describe array elements with UML2.0?, H. S. Lahman
• Estimating volumetric requirements from use cases???, Mike L
• Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, tailorma_de
  • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, tailorma_de
      • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, tailorma_de
      • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, Nacho Facello
      • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: Command pattern: Interaction allowed?, tailorma_de
• Orthogonal requirements, trichecoiob
  • Re: Orthogonal requirements, Edward V . Berard
  • Re: Orthogonal requirements, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Orthogonal requirements, trichecoiob
• Deployment and Package UML diagrams, trichecoiob
  • Re: Deployment and Package UML diagrams, srini
• Design Pattern thoughts, robjoel
  • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Phlip
    • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, topmind
    • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, AndyW
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, AndyW
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, AndyW
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, AndyW
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Phlip
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Ed
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Laurent Bossavit
  • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, AndyW
    • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Squeamizh
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Phlip
      • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Lilburne
  • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Design Pattern thoughts, Daniel T.
• Magicdraw slowness, Luca
  • Re: Magicdraw slowness, trichecoiob
• Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
  • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: How to model decoupled hierarchies?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Lilburne
  • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Neo
    • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Neo
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Neo
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Neo
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, strangebreed
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, Thomas Kowalski
      • Re: Howto model decoupled hierarchies?, strangebreed
• Large-Scale Agile Development, Patrick Egan
• Design of 3D geometrical entitiesu, nelson
• changing even handler at runtime, nelson
• Adobe Acrobat Reader Object Model, Reventlov (see signature)
• Events, aloha.kakuikanu
  • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
    • Re: Events, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, VJ Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, S Perryman
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Events, Mark Nicholls
      • orderings (Was: Events), S Perryman
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Events, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Events, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Events, AndyW
    • Message not available
      • Re: Events, AndyW
      • Re: Events, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: Events, implicit_differentiation
  • Re: Events, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Events, Leslie Sanford
    • Re: Events, aloha.kakuikanu
  • Re: Events, AndyW
• Class on UML diagram, Dawid Lorenz
  • Re: Class on UML diagram, Phlip
    • Re: Class on UML diagram, karl . wettin
• Assistant (PhD/postdoc) positions at ETH Zurich, Meyer team, Manuel Oriol
• Form - Aggregation vs. Inheritance, rm
  • Re: Form - Aggregation vs. Inheritance, H. S. Lahman
• Protected Data Dispute, barias
  • Re: Protected Data Dispute, AndyW
  • Re: Protected Data Dispute, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Protected Data Dispute, H. S. Lahman
• Optical model recognition?, karl . wettin
  • Re: Optical model recognition?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Optical model recognition?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• Re: HOM: Higher Order Messaging, Marcel Weiher
• Re: Is OOP really suitable for GUI development?, Thomas Gagne
  • Re: Is OOP really suitable for GUI development?, Phlip
    • Re: Is OOP really suitable for GUI development?, aloha.kakuikanu
• UI subsystem interface design, Brendan Guild
  • Re: UI subsystem interface design, AndyW
  • Re: UI subsystem interface design, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: UI subsystem interface design, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: UI subsystem interface design, Brendan Guild
      • Re: UI subsystem interface design, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: UI subsystem interface design, AndyW
    • Re: UI subsystem interface design, Mike Austin
      • Re: UI subsystem interface design, AndyW
• Definition of Abstract Data Type, mashrur . mia
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, Manuel Collado
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, Ed
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, Laurent Deniau
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, S Perryman
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Definition of Abstract Data Type, Miguel Oliveira e Silva
• Re: Pattern Protestations., Ravi Shankar Nair
• Showing an Event in a class diagram, edamron
  • Re: Showing an Event in a class diagram, H. S. Lahman
• Re: Advantages of object-oriented programming, Ed
  • Re: Advantages of object-oriented programming, AndyW
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Advantages of object-oriented programming, topmind
• Templated collection, tomix
• When not to use interfaces?, moop?
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, frebe73
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, raxitsheth2000
    • Re: When not to use interfaces?, raxitsheth2000
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Matt McGill
    • Re: When not to use interfaces?, frebe73
      • Re: When not to use interfaces?, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: When not to use interfaces?, frebe73
      • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Matt McGill
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Phlip
    • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Matt McGill
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Mark Nicholls
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: When not to use interfaces?, Daniel T.
• Strong argument for Use Case, Luca
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Phlip
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
    • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Prasad
    • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Robert Martin
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Luca
    • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Robert Martin
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, A.G.McDowell
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Robert Martin
    • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, trichecoiob
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Marco
  • Re: Strong argument for Use Case, Edward V . Berard
• analysis <-> project model transformation/sychronizatiom techniques, yapann
• Re: MSI WindowsInstaller.Installer List of products, rony
  • Re: MSI WindowsInstaller.Installer List of products, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Relational database & OO, ajspowart
  • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
  • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
    • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, NENASHI, Tegiri
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Relational database & OO, AndyW
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Relational database & OO, Doug Pardee
    • Re: Relational database & OO, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Relational database & OO, PS
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Robert Martin
      • Re: Relational database & OO, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Relational database & OO, frebe73
      • Re: Relational database & OO, sjdevnull@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Relational database & OO, Robert Martin
    • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Matt McGill
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Robert Martin
      • Re: Relational database & OO, Patrick May
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
      • Re: Relational database & OO, topmind
• Re: Interface rather than abstract class in Abstract Factory?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• object databases, Sasa
  • Re: object databases, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  • Re: object databases, topmind
  • Re: object databases, aloha.kakuikanu
    • Re: object databases, AndyW
    • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Re: object databases, carl . rosenberger
      • Re: object databases, topmind
      • Re: object databases, hasta_l3
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, Sasa
      • Re: object databases, Christian Brunschen
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, AndyW
      • Re: object databases, topmind
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, Phlip
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, aloha.kakuikanu
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
      • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, frebe73
  • Re: object databases, H. S. Lahman
    • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: object databases, Alvin Ryder
  • Re: object databases, carl . rosenberger
    • Message not available
      • Re: object databases, carl . rosenberger
• Re: sheltie Re: Decorator Pattern, Michael Redlich
• Re: Decorator Pattern, Michael Redlich
• Re: API Vs SPI, H. S. Lahman
• Re: "Polytypic" expressions?, H. S. Lahman
• Passing by reference, David Veeneman
  • Re: Passing by reference, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Passing by reference, Matt McGill
      • Re: Passing by reference, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Passing by reference, Matt McGill
      • Re: Passing by reference, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Passing by reference, Matt McGill
  • Re: Passing by reference, Daniel T.
  • Re: Passing by reference, Bruno Desthuilliers
  • Re: Passing by reference, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: Passing by reference, AndyW

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > General  > comp.object  > 2006-11