comp.object

• Date Index

---

• Critique of Robert C. Martin's "Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices", topmind
• Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
  • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, topmind
    • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, Neo
  • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, Daniel T.
    • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
    • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, topmind
  • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, Matt McGill
    • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
  • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
      • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
      • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, mySpamB8
      • Re: Modeling User/Accounts, H. S. Lahman
• What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, mySpamB8
  • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, aloha.kakuikanu
    • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, topmind
  • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, Daniel T.
    • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, mySpamB8
      • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, Daniel T.
      • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, mySpamB8
      • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, mySpamB8
  • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: What's the Criteria for Promoting a "Thing" to a Class, frebe73
• use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>, idob
  • Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>, Mark Woyna
  • Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  • Re: use case <<include>> vs. <<generalize>>, H. S. Lahman
• Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
  • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
    • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, JXStern
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, JXStern
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, topmind
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: double-entry bookkeeping unneeded?, Doc O'Leary
• avoid cast to derived, Grizlyk
  • Re: avoid cast to derived, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: avoid cast to derived, Daniel T.
    • Re: avoid cast to derived, Grizlyk
• BOUML : a free UML toolbox for Windows, Linux and MacOS X, bruno_pages
  • Re: BOUML : a free UML toolbox for Windows, Linux and MacOS X, bruno_pages
• OT: NC Product Design Directoy (www.ncproductdesign.com) Help Requested, Montie
• Re: Databases as objects, Ed Kirwan
  • Re: Databases as objects, Thomas Gagne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
    • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Patrick May
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, S Perryman
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
      • Re: Databases as objects, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Databases as objects, topmind
  • Re: Databases as objects, frebe73
    • Re: Databases as objects, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Databases as objects, frebe73
• modelling feeds, wooks
  • Re: modelling feeds, H. S. Lahman
• [Beginner] question on Class Diagram, Federica
  • Re: [Beginner] question on Class Diagram, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: question on Class Diagram, Doug Pardee
    • Re: question on Class Diagram, Federica
      • Re: question on Class Diagram, Pillo
• looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
  • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, aloha.kakuikanu
    • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Laurent Deniau
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, hasta_l3
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
      • Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy, V.J. Kumar
• Agile in 2007: Whats Coming, Whats Needed, Patrick Egan
• what's software used in the book of 'UML Distilled'?, flyingxu
  • Re: what's software used in the book of 'UML Distilled'?, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: what's software used in the book of 'UML Distilled'?, GeoffS
  • Re: what's software used in the book of 'UML Distilled'?, Mister UML
• difference between association and aggregation, composition?, 000.tushar@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: difference between association and aggregation, composition?, Daniel Tartaglia
• Conference Announcement: Jan. 2007 in Munich, Germany, oop
• How to express this in objects?, Phil Wardie
  • Re: How to express this in objects?, Dmitry A. Kazakov
  • Re: How to express this in objects?, Matt McGill
    • Re: How to express this in objects?, Matt McGill
  • Re: How to express this in objects?, H. S. Lahman
• HELO EVERUBODY!, NANY
  • Re: HELO EVERUBODY!, Phlip
• book recommendation for UML, Gary Wessle
  • Re: book recommendation for UML, Titantang
  • Re: book recommendation for UML, H. S. Lahman
• Newbie Question: The Origin of the "Interface" concept?, noah . ark
  • Re: Newbie Question: The Origin of the "Interface" concept?, S Perryman
  • Re: Newbie Question: The Origin of the "Interface" concept?, topmind
  • Re: Newbie Question: The Origin of the "Interface" concept?, raxitsheth2000
• [ANN] ObjectiveView 'Community' SD Magazine, Adam Weremczuk
  • Re: ObjectiveView 'Community' SD Magazine, Daniel Parker
    • Re: ObjectiveView 'Community' SD Magazine, Mark Collins-Cope
• Help me with properly create class, lennon1
  • Re: Help me with properly create class, Daniel T.
  • Re: Help me with properly create class, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Help me with properly create class, Mark Nicholls
• Good book on SOA, Pillo
  • Re: Good book on SOA, Mark Nicholls
    • Re: Good book on SOA, Daniel Parker
      • Re: Good book on SOA, Mark Nicholls
• Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
  • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Isolatable Concerns (was: Transaction Oriented Architecture...), topmind
      • Re: Isolatable Concerns, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Isolatable Concerns, topmind
      • Re: Isolatable Concerns, Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Isolatable Concerns, topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), H. S. Lahman
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
    • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Matt McGill
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Matt McGill
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
      • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), topmind
  • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Mark Nicholls
    • Re: Transaction Oriented Architecture (TOA), Thomas Gagne
• Dynamic inheritance, weer1
  • Re: Dynamic inheritance, maaxiim
    • Re: Dynamic inheritance, weer1
      • Re: Dynamic inheritance, weer1
• Confusion with MDA / DSL, Hilmar Bunjes
  • Re: Confusion with MDA / DSL, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: Confusion with MDA / DSL, Gabriel Claramunt
• Object-oriented Dissertation Theme, akira32.comp.object
  • Re: Object-oriented Dissertation Theme, H. S. Lahman
• Design issue with constructor arguments, Caroline M
  • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, Mark Nicholls
    • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, Caroline M
      • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, Mark Nicholls
      • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
  • Re: Design issue with constructor arguments, H. S. Lahman
• confusion about data abstraction, reju
  • Re: confusion about data abstraction, S Perryman
  • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel T.
    • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel T.
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, topmind
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel Parker
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, S Perryman
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel Parker
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel Parker
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Daniel Parker
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, topmind
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, Dmitry A. Kazakov
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, topmind
  • Re: confusion about data abstraction, H. S. Lahman
    • Re: confusion about data abstraction, reju
    • Re: confusion about data abstraction, reju
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, H. S. Lahman
      • Re: confusion about data abstraction, topmind
• Any XML (or another ASCII-based file) standard UML?, Silas Justiniano
  • Re: Any XML (or another ASCII-based file) standard UML?, Doug Pardee
  • Re: Any XML (or another ASCII-based file) standard UML?, topmind
• Re: Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, Marco
  • Re: Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, Marco
    • Re: Open source / downloadable compiler for Executable UML?, Matt McGill
• UML Learner looking for the answer, Johnny
  • Re: UML Learner looking for the answer, Daniel T.
    • Re: UML Learner looking for the answer, Johnny
      • Re: UML Learner looking for the answer, Daniel T.
  • Re: UML Learner looking for the answer, H. S. Lahman
• Re: Pattern Question, Mark Nicholls
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pattern Question, Nick Malik [Microsoft]
• Session Factory Error, ashwini
  • Re: Session Factory Error, Matt McGill
• Re: Auto selection, H. S. Lahman
  • Re: Auto selection, Dmitry A. Kazakov
• combination of factory method and template method patterns?, blueradiobutton
  • Re: combination of factory method and template method patterns?, Ed
    • Re: combination of factory method and template method patterns?, Ed
• Deployment diagrams of real applications, Pillo

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(16)