Re: Databases as objects
- From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:34:42 +0100
On 26 Dec 2006 09:08:02 -0800, topmind wrote:
If I say "There is no
evidence that unicorns exist", you cannot ask for an example.
No, we can immediately discard this statement as illegal. "There is no"
must be applied to an observable set. You can say "In Britanica there is no
evidences that unicorns exist." Then we could go and verify that.
Otherwise, it is always your burden to prove a universally quantified
statement. For example by showing that existing unicorns would necessarily
post in comp.object within each hour.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- References:
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: Patrick May
- Re: Databases as objects
- From: topmind
- Re: Databases as objects
- Prev by Date: avoid cast to derived
- Next by Date: Re: looking for a predicate hierarchy
- Previous by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Next by thread: Re: Databases as objects
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|